UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 8-K
CURRENT REPORT
Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported): August 6, 2013
SLM CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware | 001-13251 | 52-2013874 | ||
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation) |
(Commission File Number) |
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
300 Continental Drive, Newark, Delaware | 19713 | |
(Address of principal executive offices) | (Zip Code) |
Registrants telephone number, including area code: (302) 283-8000
(Former name or former address, if changed since last report)
Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions:
¨ | Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425) |
¨ | Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12) |
¨ | Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b)) |
¨ | Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c)) |
ITEM 7.01 | REGULATION FD DISCLOSURE. |
SLM Corporation (the Company) frequently provides relevant information to its investors via posting to its corporate website. On August 6, 2013, a presentation entitled Q2 2013 Investor Presentation was made available on the Companys web site at https://www1.salliemae.com/about/investors/webcasts/default.htm. In addition, the document is being furnished herewith as Exhibit 99.1.
The information contained in, or incorporated into, this Item 7.01, including Exhibit 99.1 attached hereto, is being furnished and shall not be deemed filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, nor shall it be deemed incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, except as shall be expressly set forth by specific reference in such filing.
ITEM 9.01 | FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND EXHIBITS. |
(d) | Exhibits |
Exhibit |
Description | |
99.1* | Q2 2013 Investor Presentation. |
* | Furnished herewith. |
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.
SLM CORPORATION | ||||||
Date: August 6, 2013 | By: | /s/ Laurent C. Lutz | ||||
Laurent C. Lutz | ||||||
Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary |
EXHIBIT INDEX
Exhibit Number |
Description | |
99.1* | Q2 2013 Investor Presentation. |
* | Furnished herewith. |
SLM
CORPORATION Q2 2013 Investor Presentation
AUGUST 6, 2013 |
2
Forward-Looking Statements; Non-GAAP Financial Measures
The following information is current as of August 6, 2013 (unless otherwise noted) and should be read
in connection with SLM Corporations Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012
(the 2012 Form 10-K), and subsequent reports filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the SEC). Definitions for capitalized terms in this presentation not defined herein can be found in the 2012
Form 10-K (filed with the SEC on February 26, 2013).
This Presentation contains forward-looking statements and information based on managements
current expectations as of the date of this presentation. Statements that are not historical facts, including
statements about the companys beliefs or expectations and statements that assume or are dependent
upon future events, are forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements are subject to risks,
uncertainties, assumptions and other factors that may cause actual results to be materially different
from those reflected in such forward-looking statements. These factors include, among others, the risks and
uncertainties set forth in Item 1A Risk Factors and elsewhere in the companys Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended Dec. 31, 2012 and subsequent filings with the Securities and Exchange
Commission; increases in financing costs; limits on liquidity; increases in costs associated with
compliance with laws and regulations; changes in accounting standards and the impact of related changes in
significant accounting estimates; any adverse outcomes in any significant litigation to which the
company is a party; credit risk associated with the companys exposure to third parties, including counterparties
to the companys derivative transactions; and changes in the terms of student loans and the
educational credit marketplace (including changes resulting from new laws and the implementation of existing laws).
The company could also be affected by, among other things: changes in its funding costs and
availability; reductions to its credit ratings or the credit ratings of the United States of America; failures of its
operating systems or infrastructure, including those of third-party vendors; damage to its
reputation; failures to successfully implement cost-cutting and adverse effects of such initiatives on its business; risks
associated with restructuring initiatives, including the companys recently announced strategic
plan to separate its existing operations into two separate publicly traded companies; changes in the demand for
educational financing or in financing preferences of lenders, educational institutions, students and
their families; changes in law and regulations with respect to the student lending business and financial
institutions generally; increased competition from banks and other consumer lenders; the
creditworthiness of its customers; changes in the general interest rate environment, including the rate relationships
among relevant money-market instruments and those of its earning assets vs. its funding
arrangements; changes in general economic conditions; and changes in the demand for debt management services.
The preparation of the companys consolidated financial statements also requires management to
make certain estimates and assumptions including estimates and assumptions about future events. These
estimates or assumptions may prove to be incorrect. All forward-looking statements contained in
this release are qualified by these cautionary statements and are made only as of the date of this release. The
company does not undertake any obligation to update or revise these forward-looking statements to
conform the statement to actual results or changes in its expectations
The Company reports financial results on a GAAP basis and also provides certain core earnings
performance measures. The difference between the Companys core earnings and GAAP results for the periods
presented were the unrealized, mark-to-market gains/losses on derivative contracts and the
goodwill and acquired intangible asset amortization and impairment. These items are recognized in GAAP but not in
core earnings results. The Company provides core earnings measures because this is what management uses
when making management decisions regarding the Companys performance and the allocation of
corporate resources. The Companys core earnings are not defined terms within GAAP and may not be
comparable to similarly titled measures reported by other companies. For additional information, see
Core Earnings Definition and Limitations in the Companys second quarter
earnings release for a further discussion and a complete reconciliation between GAAP net income and core earnings.
|
3
SLM Corporation
The U.S. Student Loan Market
Page 4
SLM Corporation Overview
Page 9
Credit Quality
Page 17
Funding Diversity and Liquidity
Page 29
Risk-Adjusted Capital
Page 39
FFELP ABS Appendix
Page 42
Private Education Loan ABS Appendix
Page 47
SLM Appendix
Page 68 |
4
The U.S. Student Loan Market |
5
Favorable Student Loan Market Trends
Source: Trends in College Pricing.©
2012 The College Board,. www.collegeboard.org,
Note: Academic years, average published tuition, fees, room and board charges at four-year
institutions; enrollment-weighted
Higher Education Enrollment (millions)
Annual Cost of Education ($ thousands)
Source: CBO May 2013 Baseline Projections for the Student Loan Program by fiscal year
Note: Excludes consolidation volume
Federal Student Loan Origination Volume ($ billions)
Relationship Between Higher Education, Income and Employment
Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Current Population Survey, 2012 Annual Social and
Economic Supplement. Represents median earnings for a full time, year-round worker over age
25. Unemployment data as
of
Annual
Average
2012.
Represents
unemployment
for
civilian
non-institutional
population
over
age
25.
Unemployment
Average annual income
19.1
20.4
21.0
21.0
21.3
21.5
22.2
23.8
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2016
2021
11.4
12.1
12.8
13.6
14.4
16.2
17.1
17.9
$27.5
$28.7
$30.5
$32.0
$33.8
$35.1
$36.5
$38.0
$39.5
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
Public
Private
15.2
105.9
109.0
112.5
116.6
120.5
124.4
128.4
132.3
136.4
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
0%
2%
4%
6%
8%
10%
12%
14%
0
10,000
40,000
50,000
60,000
70,000
80,000
90,000
100,000
Less than H.S.
High school
Some college
Associate
Bachelor's
Master's
Doctorate
Professional
20,000
30,000
SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, Higher Education
General Information Survey (HEGIS), "Fall Enrollment in Colleges and Universities"
surveys, 1970 and 1980; Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS), "Fall
Enrollment Survey" (IPEDS-EF:90-99); IPEDS Spring 2001 through Spring 2012,
Enrollment component; and Projections of Education Statistics to 2021. U.S. Department of Commerce,
Census Bureau, Current Population Survey (CPS), October, selected years, 1970 through 2011. (This
table was prepared December 2012.)
|
6
College Grads Experience Lower Levels of Unemployment
Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics as of 3/31/2013
Total Unemployment Rate
Unemployment Rate with a Bachelor's Degree or Higher
|
7
Private Education Loan products bridge the funding gap between the cost of a
college education and funds available through U.S. Department of Education
(ED) programs, grants, and other sources Estimates for academic year
2011-12 project that 21 million students will enroll in higher education and incur costs
of over $436 billion; $7 billion of which is funded by private education
loans Role of Private Education Loans
Source:
Trends
in
College
Pricing
.©
2012
The
College
Board,.
U.S. Department of Education 2012
Source: U.S. Department of Education, Presidents 2013 Budget &
Company analysis Cost of College (Based on a Four-Year Term)
Total Cost of Education (in billions)
2011/2012 Academic Year
www.collegeboard.org, |
8
2011-12 academic year market share approximately 47%
Private Education Loan Industry Originations
Source:
Trends
in
Student
Aid.
©
2012
The
College
Board,.
www.collegeboard.org,
industry
data
is
preliminary.
Based
on
current
dollars.
Data
reported
by
academic
year,
SLM
quarterly
data
converted
to
academic
year
basis.
Private Education Loan originations declined from their peak as a result of an
increase in federal student loan limits, an overall increase in the use of
federal student loans, an increase in federal grants, and tighter
underwriting standards. |
9
SLM Corporation Overview |
10
#1 saving, planning and paying for education
company with 40-years of leadership in the
education lending market
#1 servicer and collector of student loans in the
U.S. for FFELP and Private Education Loans
Serving 25 million unique customers
$146
billion student loan portfolio, 75% of which
is insured or guaranteed
Fully independent private sector company with
scale and a broad franchise, traded on the
NASDAQ (ticker: SLM)
SLM Corporation
1
Federal Family Education Loan Program (FFELP).
1 |
11
As of June 30, 2013
Net of provision
A Brief Corporate History
As of July 31, 2013
1965
Congress
creates
the
Guaranteed
Student
Loan
Program,
currently
known
as FFELP
1972
Congress establishes, as a GSE, the Student Loan Marketing Association
or Sallie Mae
1996
Privatization of Sallie Mae approved by Congress, SLM Corporation
holding company created
2004
GSE dissolved
SLM Corporation becomes a fully independent, private
sector corporation
2008
Challenging economy; U.S. Government support of FFELP, private
education lending curtailed
2009
Smart Option private loan introduced
SLM wins 5 year contract to service for US Dept. Education
2010
FFELP eliminated in legislative reform July 2010
SLM acquires $25 billion FFELP portfolio from Student Loan Corporation
2013
Announces planned separation into two distinct business, an education
loan management company and a consumer banking company.
SLM Corporate
Debt
Ratings
Moodys
S & P
Fitch
Long
-
Term
Ba1
BBB
-
BB+
Short
-
Term
Not-Prime
A-3
B
Outlook
Neg.
Neg.
Neg.
Loan Portfolio
Loan Type
$billions
%
FFELP Loans
$108.5
75%
Private
Education
$37.1
25%
Total Portfolio
$145.6
100% |
12
Q2 13 Core Earnings
Summary
*
* For
a
GAAP
to
Core
Earnings
reconciliation,
see
slide
69
($ millions, except per share amounts)
Q2 13
Q1 13
Q2 12
EPS (Reported)
$1.02
$0.61
$0.49
Net Income
$462
$283
$243
Net Interest Income
$675
$676
$656
Loan Loss Provision
$201
$241
$243
Fee and Other Income
$476
$279
$208
Operating Expenses
$258
$250
$231
Average Student Loans
$152,135
$160,261
$172,436 |
13
Consumer Lending Segment Earnings Detail
Core Earnings
Basis
($ millions)
Q2 13
Q1 13
Q2 12
Private Originations
$368
$1,411
$321
Average Private Education Loans
$38,154
$38,406
$37,543
Net Interest Income after Provision - Private
$235
$196
$188
Net Interest Margin - Private Education
(1)
4.12%
4.15%
4.14%
Operating Expenses
$76
$68
$63
OpEx Annualized as a % of Average Private Education Loans
0.80%
0.71%
0.68%
Net Income
$107
$87
$85
(1)
Includes non-GAAP adjustments of 0.04%, 0.03%, and 0.11%, respectively, related
to the accounting for derivative instruments. |
14
Business Services Segment Earnings Detail
Core Earnings
Basis
($ millions)
Q2 13
Q1 13
Q2 12
Intercompany loan servicing
$137
$149
$172
Third-party loan servicing
$33
$27
$26
Guarantor servicing
$10
$10
$11
Other servicing
$20
$19
$18
Contingency revenue
$109
$99
$87
Other Business Services revenue
$8
$7
$7
Net Income
$166
$125
$137 |
15
FFELP Loan Segment Earnings Detail
Core Earnings
Basis
($ millions)
Q2 13
Q1 13
Q2 12
Average FFELP Loans
$113,981
$121,855
$134,893
Net Interest Income after Provision - FFELP
$244
$245
$228
Net Interest Margin - FFELP
(1)
0.87%
0.83%
0.70%
Operating Expenses
$144
$157
$181
OpEx Annualized as a % of Average FFELP Loans
0.51%
0.52%
0.54%
Net Income
$237
$104
$44
(1)Includes non-GAAP adjustments of (0.38%), (0.40%), and (0.30%) respectively,
related to the accounting for derivative instruments. $257 million and $55
million gains from residual interest sales in Q2 13 and Q1 13, respectively |
16
Operations Locations
Corporate Headquarters
Fishers, IN
Collections
Information Technology
Servicing
Fulfillment
Call Center
Sales
Reston, VA
Finance/Accounting
Legal
Information Technology
New York State
(Arcade, Perry,
Horseheads)
Collections
Cincinnati, OH
Collections
Salt Lake City, UT
Sallie Mae Bank
Wilkes-Barre, PA
Servicing
Call Center
Newark, DE Headquarters
Executive Offices
Credit &Collections
Customer Resolution
Servicing
Fraud
Business Development
Washington, DC
Government Relations
Moorestown, NJ
Collections
Newton, MA
Upromise Inv.
& Rewards
Business Dev.
Kansas City, MO
Upromise Investments
Muncie, IN
Collections |
17
Credit Quality |
18
Private Education Loan Portfolio Characteristics
$37 billion portfolio
25% of SLMs total student loan portfolio
Approximately 66% of portfolio has a cosigner, typically a parent
Loans originated since 2009 are approximately 90% cosigned with average FICO
scores above 740
Higher education loans typically non-dischargeable in bankruptcy
Integrated underwriting, servicing and collections
SLMs Private Education Loan Portfolio
As of June 30, 2013 |
19
Smart
Option
Student
Loan
product
offers
three
repayment
choices
designed
to
help
borrowers
balance their goals and budget while in school
Interest Only -
Requires interest only payment during in-school period
Fixed
Repayment
-
Requires
$25
monthly
payments
during
in-school
period
Deferred
Repayment
Allows
the
customer
to
defer
payments
while
in-school
Variable and Fixed Interest Rate Options
Repayment
term
is
driven
by
cumulative
amount
borrowed
and
grade
level
Full communication with customers during in-school period
Full
collection
activities
are
employed
at
both
the
customer
and
cosigner
level
All loans are certified by the schools financial aid office to ensure that
proceeds are used for education expenses
SLMs Private Education Smart Option Student Loan Products
|
20
Private Education Loans
High Quality Originations
Originations
of $3.3 bn in
2012 had an
average winning FICO of 748 and 90% were cosigned.
Originations of $2.7 bn in 2011 had an average winning FICO of 748 and 91% were cosigned. Originations of $2.3 bn in 2010 had
an average winning FICO of 739 and 89% were cosigned. |
21
Low Risk = Smart Option, Legacy Traditional Cosigned, and
Law/MBA/MED/CT/Other Moderate Risk = Legacy Traditional
Non-Cosigned Elevated Risk = Non-Traditional
Consumer Lending Segment
High Quality Portfolio |
22
Private Education
Loans
(2)
25%
U.S. Government
Guaranteed Loans
75%
Charge-Offs
(1)
= 0.07%
Charge-Offs
(1)
= 2.34%
Total Charge-Offs
(1)
= 0.63%
(1)
All data as of Six Months Ended June 30, 2013. Annualized FFELP charge-offs as
a percentage of average FFELP Loans. Annualized Private Education Loan charge-offs as a
percentage of average Private Education Loans. Annualized total charge-offs as
a percentage of average FFELP Loans and Private Education Loans. (2)
Percentages of total student loan portfolio based upon average portfolio
balances. Student Loan Portfolio
SLM Loan Losses
(2)
(2) |
23
Private Credit Default Performance
As of June 30, 2013
8%
14%
17%
14%
11%
8%
6%
5%
4%
3%
3%
2%
2%
2%
2%
8%
22%
39%
52%
63%
71%
77%
82%
86%
89%
92%
94%
96%
98%
100%
0%
50%
100%
12
24
36
48
60
72
84
96
108
120
132
144
156
168
180
Months Since Repayment Begin Date
Defaults Per Months Since Repayment Begin Date
Cumulative Defaults
60%
11%
7%
5%
4%
3%
3%
2%
2%
1%
1%
1%
1%
0%
1%
60%
71%
78%
83%
86%
89%
92%
94%
95%
96%
97%
98%
99%
99%
100%
0%
50%
100%
12
24
36
48
60
72
84
96
108
120
132
144
156
168
180
# Payments Made
Defaults Per Payments Made
Cumulative Defaults
Historical Defaults by Payments Made
Historical Defaults by Months in Repayment
The probability of default substantially diminishes as the number of payments and years of seasoning
increases |
24
Private Education Loan Portfolio Performance
(1) Charge-offs as a percentage of average loans in repayment annualized for
the quarters presented Q213
Q113
Q412
Q312
Q212
Charge-offs - Traditional Portfolio
(1)
2.1%
2.5%
3.4%
2.6%
2.5%
Charge-offs - Non-Traditional Portfolio
(1)
9.1%
8.7%
13.2%
10.5%
9.8%
Charge-offs - Total Portfolio
(1)
2.7%
3.0%
4.2%
3.2%
3.1%
90+ Day Delinq as a % of Repay - Traditional Portfolio
3.1%
3.3%
3.9%
4.4%
3.7%
90+ Day Delinq as a % of Repay - Non-Traditional Portfolio
10.2%
11.2%
12.6%
14.6%
12.6%
90+ Day Delinq as a % of Repay - Total Portfolio
3.6%
3.9%
4.6%
5.3%
4.5%
Forb as a % of Forb & Repay - Traditional Portfolio
3.4%
3.2%
3.3%
3.1%
4.1%
Forb as a % of Forb & Repay - Non-Traditional Portfolio
5.5%
5.1%
5.1%
5.0%
6.4%
Forb as a % of Forb & Repay - Total Portfolio
3.5%
3.4%
3.5%
3.2%
4.3%
Allowance as a % of Loans in Repay - Traditional Portfolio
5.6%
5.7%
5.7%
5.8%
5.7%
Allowance as a % of Loans in Repay - Non-Traditional Portfolio
21.0%
21.0%
20.7%
21.5%
22.5%
Allowance as a % of Loans in Repay - Total Portfolio
6.8%
6.9%
6.9%
7.1%
7.1% |
25
Private Education Loan Portfolio Performance
(1) Charge-offs as a percentage of average loans in repayment annualized for
the quarters presented Traditional Loans with a Cosigner
Q213
Q113
Q412
Q312
Q212
Outstanding Balance as a % of Total
64%
63%
62%
62%
60%
90+ Delinquency as a % of Repayment
2.3%
2.4%
2.9%
3.2%
2.7%
Forbearance as a % of Repayment & Forbearance
3.3%
3.2%
3.3%
2.9%
3.8%
Charge-Offs as a % of Repayment
(1)
1.4%
1.6%
2.1%
1.6%
1.5%
Traditional Loans without a Cosigner
Q213
Q113
Q412
Q312
Q212
Outstanding Balance as a % of Total
29%
29%
30%
30%
31%
90+ Delinquency as a % of Repayment
4.6%
5.1%
5.8%
6.7%
5.5%
Forbearance as a % of Repayment & Forbearance
3.6%
3.3%
3.4%
3.3%
4.5%
Charge-Offs as a % of Repayment
(1)
3.7%
4.3%
5.9%
4.5%
4.3%
Non-Traditional Loans with a Cosigner
Q213
Q113
Q412
Q312
Q212
Outstanding Balance as a % of Total
2%
2%
3%
3%
3%
90+ Delinquency as a % of Repayment
8.7%
9.5%
10.9%
12.3%
10.3%
Forbearance as a % of Repayment & Forbearance
6.8%
6.6%
6.5%
6.2%
7.6%
Charge-Offs as a % of Repayment
(1)
6.2%
5.6%
8.8%
6.9%
6.6%
Non-Traditional Loans without a Cosigner
Q213
Q113
Q412
Q312
Q212
Outstanding Balance as a % of Total
5%
6%
6%
6%
6%
90+ Delinquency as a % of Repayment
10.9%
12.0%
13.3%
15.6%
13.5%
Forbearance as a % of Repayment & Forbearance
5.0%
4.5%
4.6%
4.5%
5.9%
Charge-Offs as a % of Repayment
(1)
10.3%
10.0%
15.0%
11.9%
11.1% |
26
(Dollars in millions)
Loan Seasoning
June 30, 2013
Traditional Portfolio
Monthly
Scheduled Payments Due
Not Yet in Repayment
5,475
Loans in Forbearance
498
7.8%
170
3.2%
149
2.7%
86
1.9%
112
1.3%
1,015
3.4%
Loans in Repayment-
Current
5,249
81.8%
4,683
89.2%
4,996
91.0%
4,169
93.1%
8,121
95.2%
27,218
90.2%
Loans in Repayment-
Delinq 31-60 days
201
3.1%
126
2.4%
117
2.1%
84
1.9%
122
1.4%
650
2.1%
Loans in Repayment-
Delinq 61-90 days
137
2.1%
77
1.5%
73
1.3%
45
1.0%
63
0.7%
395
1.3%
Loans in Repayment-
Delinq 90 + days
334
5.2%
193
3.7%
155
2.8%
95
2.1%
115
1.4%
892
3.0%
6,419
$
100%
5,249
$
100%
5,490
$
100%
4,479
$
100%
8,533
$
100%
30,170
$
100%
Charge-offs as a % of loans in repayment
4.8%
2.3%
1.7%
1.2%
0.9%
2.1%
Non-Traditional Portfolio
Monthly Scheduled Payments Due
Not Yet in Repayment
421
Loans in Forbearance
86
12.1%
22
5.1%
13
3.4%
10
2.8%
14
1.8%
145
5.5%
Loans in Repayment-
Current
422
59.2%
313
72.5%
307
79.0%
286
83.3%
650
87.8%
1,978
75.6%
Loans in Repayment-
Delinq 31-60 days
53
7.4%
26
6.1%
20
5.1%
15
4.4%
28
3.8%
142
5.4%
Loans in Repayment-
Delinq 61-90 days
44
6.2%
18
4.1%
13
3.4%
9
2.7%
16
2.2%
100
3.8%
Loans in Repayment-
Delinq 90 + days
108
15.1%
53
12.2%
35
9.1%
23
6.8%
33
4.4%
252
9.6%
713
$
100%
432
$
100%
388
$
100%
343
$
100%
741
$
100%
2,617
$
100%
Charge-offs as a % of loans in repayment
17.4%
10.6%
6.6%
4.2%
3.1%
9.1%
Total
Monthly Scheduled Payments Due
Not Yet in Repayment
5,896
Loans in Forbearance
584
8.2%
192
3.4%
162
2.8%
96
2.0%
126
1.4%
1,160
3.5%
Loans in Repayment-
Current
5,671
79.5%
4,996
87.9%
5,303
90.2%
4,455
92.4%
8,771
94.6%
29,196
89.0%
Loans in Repayment-
Delinq 31-60 days
254
3.6%
152
2.7%
137
2.3%
99
2.1%
150
1.6%
792
2.4%
Loans in Repayment-
Delinq 61-90 days
181
2.5%
95
1.7%
86
1.5%
54
1.1%
79
0.9%
495
1.5%
Loans in Repayment-
Delinq 90 + days
442
6.2%
246
4.3%
190
3.2%
118
2.4%
148
1.6%
1,144
3.5%
7,132
$
100%
5,681
$
100%
5,878
$
100%
4,822
$
100%
9,274
$
100%
32,787
$
100%
Charge-offs as a % of loans in repayment
6.1%
2.9%
2.1%
1.5%
1.1%
2.7%
More than 48 payments
Total
Total Loans in Repayment or Forbearance
Total Loans in Repayment or Forbearance
Loan Status
0-12 payments
13-24 payments
25-36 payments
37-48 payments
Total
Total Loans in Repayment or Forbearance
Loan Status
0-12 payments
13-24 payments
25-36 payments
37-48 payments
More than 48 payments
Total
Loan Status
0-12 payments
13-24 payments
25-36 payments
37-48 payments
More than 48 payments |
27
(Dollars in millions)
Loan Seasoning
March 31, 2013
Traditional Portfolio
Monthly Scheduled Payments Due
Not Yet in Repayment
5,959
Loans in Forbearance
502
7.8%
166
3.1%
134
2.4%
71
1.6%
93
1.1%
966
3.2%
Loans in Repayment- Current
5,191
80.8%
4,837
89.6%
5,033
91.3%
4,214
93.8%
7,797
95.5%
27,072
90.3%
Loans in Repayment- Delinq 31-60 days
198
3.1%
116
2.2%
111
2.0%
72
1.6%
100
1.2%
597
2.0%
Loans in Repayment- Delinq 61-90 days
147
2.3%
77
1.4%
68
1.2%
45
1.0%
56
0.7%
393
1.3%
Loans in Repayment- Delinq 90 + days
386
6.0%
201
3.7%
165
3.0%
92
2.0%
116
1.4%
960
3.2%
6,424
$
100%
5,397
$
100%
5,511
$
100%
4,494
$
100%
8,162
$
100%
29,988
$
100%
Charge-offs as a % of loans in repayment
6.1%
2.4%
1.8%
1.4%
0.9%
2.5%
Non-Traditional Portfolio
Monthly Scheduled Payments Due
Not Yet in Repayment
475
Loans in Forbearance
85
11.1%
18
4.7%
11
2.9%
8
2.4%
13
1.8%
135
5.1%
Loans in Repayment- Current
454
59.5%
319
73.0%
312
78.5%
291
84.7%
621
87.9%
1,997
75.5%
Loans in Repayment- Delinq 31-60 days
54
7.1%
23
5.2%
21
5.3%
13
3.9%
23
3.2%
134
5.1%
Loans in Repayment- Delinq 61-90 days
42
5.4%
18
4.2%
14
3.5%
9
2.7%
15
2.1%
98
3.7%
Loans in Repayment- Delinq 90 + days
127
16.7%
59
13.6%
39
9.8%
23
6.5%
34
4.9%
282
10.7%
762
$
100%
437
$
100%
397
$
100%
344
$
100%
706
$
100%
2,646
$
100%
Charge-offs as a % of loans in repayment
16.8%
10.1%
6.3%
4.1%
3.0%
8.7%
Total Managed
Monthly Scheduled Payments Due
Not Yet in Repayment
6,434
Loans in Forbearance
587
8.2%
184
3.2%
145
2.5%
79
1.6%
106
1.2%
1,101
3.4%
Loans in Repayment- Current
5,645
78.6%
5,156
88.4%
5,345
90.5%
4,505
93.1%
8,418
94.9%
29,069
89.1%
Loans in Repayment- Delinq 31-60 days
252
3.5%
139
2.4%
132
2.2%
85
1.8%
123
1.4%
731
2.2%
Loans in Repayment- Delinq 61-90 days
189
2.6%
95
1.6%
82
1.4%
54
1.1%
71
0.8%
491
1.5%
Loans in Repayment- Delinq 90 + days
513
7.1%
260
4.5%
204
3.4%
115
2.4%
150
1.7%
1,242
3.8%
7,186
$
100%
5,834
$
100%
5,908
$
100%
4,838
$
100%
8,868
$
100%
32,634
$
100%
Charge-offs as a % of loans in repayment
7.2%
3.0%
2.1%
1.6%
1.1%
3.0%
Total
Total Loans in Repayment or Forbearance
Loan Status
0-12 payments
13-24 payments
25-36 payments
37-48 payments
More than 48 payments
Total
Loan Status
0-12 payments
13-24 payments
25-36 payments
37-48 payments
More than 48 payments
More than 48 payments
Total
Total Loans in Repayment or Forbearance
Total Loans in Repayment or Forbearance
Loan Status
0-12 payments
13-24 payments
25-36 payments
37-48 payments |
28
(Dollars in millions)
Loan Seasoning
June 30, 2012
Traditional Portfolio
Monthly Scheduled Payments Due
Loan Status
0-12 payments
13-24 payments
25-36 payments
37-48 payments
More than 48 payments
Total
Not Yet in Repayment
5,529
Loans in Forbearance
717
9.3%
190
3.1%
131
2.5%
66
1.8%
82
1.3%
1,186
4.1%
Loans
in
Repayment-
Current
5,881
76.0%
5,504
89.2%
4,799
90.6%
3,344
93.0%
6,141
95.1%
25,669
87.7%
Loans
in
Repayment-
Delinq
31-60
days
380
4.9%
173
2.8%
139
2.6%
71
2.0%
99
1.5%
862
2.9%
Loans
in
Repayment-
Delinq
61-90
days
240
3.1%
95
1.5%
77
1.4%
39
1.1%
47
0.7%
498
1.7%
Loans
in
Repayment-
Delinq
90
+
days
521
6.7%
209
3.4%
152
2.9%
75
2.1%
89
1.4%
1,046
3.6%
Total Loans in Repayment or Forbearance
7,739
$
100%
6,171
$
100%
5,298
$
100%
3,595
$
100%
6,458
$
100%
29,261
$
100%
Charge-offs as a % of loans in repayment
5.1%
2.4%
1.6%
1.3%
0.9%
2.5%
Non-Traditional Portfolio
Monthly Scheduled Payments Due
Loan Status
0-12 payments
13-24 payments
25-36 payments
37-48 payments
More than 48 payments
Total
Not Yet in Repayment
569
Loans in Forbearance
121
12.0%
24
4.9%
16
3.8%
8
2.5%
13
2.2%
182
6.4%
Loans
in
Repayment-
Current
525
52.0%
343
70.8%
329
77.3%
277
84.1%
507
86.1%
1,981
69.8%
Loans
in
Repayment-
Delinq
31-60
days
98
9.7%
34
7.1%
25
5.9%
16
4.6%
23
3.9%
196
6.9%
Loans
in
Repayment-
Delinq
61-90
days
81
8.0%
24
4.9%
16
3.8%
9
2.9%
15
2.6%
145
5.1%
Loans
in
Repayment-
Delinq
90
+
days
185
18.3%
60
12.3%
39
9.2%
19
5.9%
31
5.2%
334
11.8%
Total Loans in Repayment or Forbearance
1,010
$
100%
485
$
100%
425
$
100%
329
$
100%
589
$
100%
2,838
$
100%
Charge-offs as a % of loans in repayment
17.8%
10.2%
5.1%
3.5%
3.4%
9.8%
Total
Monthly Scheduled Payments Due
Loan Status
0-12 payments
13-24 payments
25-36 payments
37-48 payments
More than 48 payments
Total
Not Yet in Repayment
6,098
Loans in Forbearance
838
9.6%
214
3.2%
147
2.6%
74
1.9%
95
1.3%
1,368
4.3%
Loans
in
Repayment-
Current
6,406
73.2%
5,847
87.9%
5,128
89.6%
3,621
92.3%
6,648
94.4%
27,650
86.1%
Loans
in
Repayment-
Delinq
31-60
days
478
5.5%
207
3.1%
164
2.9%
87
2.2%
122
1.7%
1,058
3.3%
Loans
in
Repayment-
Delinq
61-90
days
321
3.6%
119
1.8%
93
1.6%
48
1.2%
62
0.9%
643
2.0%
Loans
in
Repayment-
Delinq
90
+
days
706
8.1%
269
4.0%
191
3.3%
94
2.4%
120
1.7%
1,380
4.3%
Total Loans in Repayment or Forbearance
8,749
$
100%
6,656
$
100%
5,723
$
100%
3,924
$
100%
7,047
$
100%
32,099
$
100%
Charge-offs as a % of loans in repayment
6.6%
2.9%
1.9%
1.5%
1.1%
3.1% |
29
Funding Diversity and Liquidity |
30
Issued $2.5 billion of Private ABS
Issued $3.7 billion of FFELP ABS
Issued $1.5 billion of long-term unsecured debt
Sold residual interests in five FFELP securitization trusts totaling $12.5 billion
of assets Returned
$400
million
to
shareholders
through
common
share
repurchases
during
1
half
of
2013
In July 2013, the company authorized an additional $400 million for common share
repurchases Closed on a $6.8 billion FFELP ABCP facility and a $1.1 billion
Private ABCP facility Repurchased $800 million of outstanding unsecured debt
through tender offers Maintained excess capital at Bank and SLM
Corporation 2013 Capital Markets Summary
(1)
As of June 30, 2013.
st |
31
Non-Consolidation FFELP
Non-Consolidation FFELP
Non-Consolidation FFELP
Issue
$1,246M SLM Trust 2013-3
$1,246M SLM Trust 2013-2
$1,249M SLM Trust 2013-1
Pricing Date
June 12, 2013
April 3, 2013
February 5, 2013
Collateral
US Govt. Guaranteed or Insured
FFELP Stafford and Plus Loans
US Govt. Guaranteed or Insured
FFELP Stafford and Plus Loans
US Govt. Guaranteed or Insured
FFELP Stafford and Plus Loans
Prepayment
Speed
(1)
6% Constant Prepayment Rate
6% Constant Prepayment Rate
6% Constant Prepayment Rate
Tranching
Moodys
Amt
WAL
(1)
Pricing
(2)
A-1 Aaa $262
1.0 L+26 A-2
Aaa $315 3.0 L+36
A-3 Aaa $634
6.7 L+60 B
Aa1 $35 8.9 L+240
Moodys
Amt
WAL
(1)
Pricing
(2)
A Aaa
$1,211 4.4 L+45
B
Aa1 $35 8.8 L+210
Moodys
Amt
WAL
(1)
Pricing
(2)
A-1 Aaa $280
1.0 L+17 A-2
Aaa $396 3.3 L+25
A-3 Aaa $538
6.8 L+55
B
A1 $35 8.6 L+225
Recent SLM FFELP ABS Transactions
(1)
Estimated based on a variety of assumptions concerning loan repayment behavior, as
more fully described in the related prospectus, which may be obtained at
http://www2.salliemae.com/investors/debtasset/slmsltrusts/. Actual average life may
vary significantly from estimates. (2)
Pricing represents the yield to expected call. |
32
Recent SLM Private Education Loan ABS Transactions
(1)
Estimated based on a variety of assumptions concerning loan repayment behavior, as
more fully described in the related prospectus, which may be obtained at
http://www2.salliemae.com/investors/debtasset/slmsltrusts/. Actual average life may
vary significantly from estimates. (2)
Yield on fixed rate A-2 tranches were 2.11%, 1.78% and 2.10%, for 2013-B,
2013-A, and 2012-E, respectively. Yield on fixed rate B tranches were 3.48% and 3.69%, for
2013-B and 2013-A,, respectively.
Private Education Loans
Private Education Loans
Private Education Loans
Issue
$1,135M SLM Trust 2013-B
$1,108M SLM Trust 2013-A
$976M SLM Trust 2012-E
Pricing Date
April 25, 2013
February 27, 2013
October 11, 2012
Collateral
Private Education Loans
Private Education Loans
Private Education Loans
Prepayment Speed
(1)
4%
4%
4%
Tranching
Moodys
Amt
WAL
(1)
Pricing
(2)
Moodys
Amt
WAL
(1)
Pricing
(2)
Moodys
Amt
WAL
(1)
Pricing
(2)
A-1
Aaa
$690
1.8
L+60
A-2A
Aaa
$143
4.6
s+ 95
A-2B
Aaa
$143
4.6
L+105
B
A
$132
5.7
s+238
Total
$1,108
2.9
L+115
A-1
Aaa
$680
1.7
L+65
A-2A
Aaa
$245
4.8
s+ 105
A-2B
Aaa
$100
4.8
L+110
B
A
$110
6.0
s+260
Total
$1,135
3.1
L+120
A-1
Aaa
$676
1.7
L+75
A-2A
Aaa
$100
4.5
s+ 140
A-2B
Aaa
$200
4.5
L+175
Total
$976
2.6
L+122 |
33
High Percentage of Student Loans Funded to Term
*
Gross loans, Numbers may not add due to rounding.
Fixed
Spread
Liabilities,
$24
Bn
Conduits, $12 Bn
$146* Billion Student Loan Portfolio
as of June 30, 2013
FFELP Consolidation Term ABS, $60 Bn
FFELP Non-Consolidation Term ABS, $30 Bn
Private Term ABS, $20 Bn
Funded to Term, $110 Bn |
34
Unsecured Debt Maturities
Note: Does not include Sallie Mae Bank or Subsidiary funding
Total unsecured debt outstanding of $17.5 billion
As of June 30, 2013
(par value, $ in billions)
$0
$5
$10
$1.2
$2.5
$1.5
$2.3
$1.8
$2.8
$0.2
$1.5
$3.7 |
35
Secured Cash Flow
Note: Totals may not add due to rounding, As of June 30, 2013
*
Net residual represents excess distribution, net of payments on floor contracts and
receipts from basis swaps $ in Millions
2013 YTD
2012
2011
2010
FFELP
Term Securitized
Servicing (Cash Paid)
$
256
$
526
$
563
$
533
Net Residual* (Excess Distributions)
286
628
715
746
Other Secured FFELP
Net Cash Flow
305
934
568
1,465
Total FFELP
$
847
$
2,088
$
1,846
$
2,743
Total Proceeds from Residual Sales
$
589
Private Credit
Term Securitized
Servicing (Cash Paid)
$
100
$
181
$
189
$
179
Residual (Excess Distribution)
56
103
28
8
Other Secured Financings
Net Cash Flow
4
22
2
-
Total Private Credit
$
160
$
306
$
219
$
187
Total FFELP and Private Credit
$
1,596
$
2,394
$
2,065
$
2,930
Average Principal Balances
2013 YTD
2012
2011
2010
FFELP
Term FFELP
$
98,858
$
104,913
$
109,509
$
99,041
Other Secured FFELP
13,109
22,271
29,466
38,767
Total FFELP
$
111,967
$
127,184
$
138,975
$
137,808
Private Credit
Term Private Credit
$
26,577
$
25,111
$
25,619
$
25,854
Other Secured Financings
769
1,875
233
-
Total Private Credit
$
27,346
$
26,987
$
25,853
$
25,854
Total FFELP and Private Credit
$
139,314
$
154,171
$
164,828
$
163,661 |
36
Projected Cash Flows From FFELP Portfolio
*
Assumptions
No Floor Income, CPR/CDR = Stafford & Plus (4.0%), Consolidation (3.0%)
Excludes assets and excess spread associated with residual sales
* These projections are based on internal estimates and assumptions and are subject to
ongoing review and modification. These projections may prove to be incorrect.
($ in Millions)
Total Cash Flows from Projected Excess Spread = $8.1 Billion
Total Cash Flows from Projected Servicing Revenues = $4.5 Billion
as of 6/30/13
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
Projected FFELP Average Balance
$103,954
$97,107
$87,813
$78,744
$70,129
$61,795
$54,069
$46,878
Projected Excess Spread
$447
$820
$749
$720
$768
$698
$628
$557
Projected Servicing Revenue
$308
$579
$527
$477
$426
$374
$325
$279
Projected Total Revenue
$755
$1,399
$1,276
$1,197
$1,194
$1,071
$953
$836
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026
2027
2028 - 2033
Projected FFELP Average Balance
$40,251
$34,204
$29,073
$24,931
$21,055
$17,375
$13,915
$5,563
Projected Excess Spread
$490
$425
$342
$287
$258
$223
$190
$501
Projected Servicing Revenue
$237
$198
$165
$141
$120
$100
$82
$206
Projected Total Revenue
$727
$623
$507
$428
$379
$324
$271
$707 |
37
Bank charter
Utah based ILC regulated by FDIC and Utah Department of Financial Institutions
(UDFI)
Charter granted October 2005
Current bank activity
Total assets of $9.1 billion at June 30, 2013
Originates Sallie Maes Private Education Loans
Funded through affiliate, brokered and direct retail deposits
17.1% Total Risk-based Capital at June 30, 2013
Dividends of $120 million paid 2013 YTD
Deposit taking activities
Deposits totaled $7.6 billion at June 30, 2013
$4.6 billion Brokered Deposits
$3.0 billion Direct Retail and other affiliate and non-affiliate
Deposits
Brokered Deposit term portfolio has a weighted average maturity of 20.3
months
Total deposits increased 48% over 2Q12 and decreased 5% versus 1Q13
Sallie Mae Bank |
Sallie Mae Bank
Capital & Deposits
*Primarily affiliate deposit accounts with no stated maturities
Bank Deposits ($ millions)
Brokered CDs
Brokered
Other
Retail Deposits
Other Deposits*
Total Deposits
$3,552
$3,975
$4,098
$3,346
$2,352
$3,455
536
685
810
1,069
1,077
1,071
2,548
2,521
2,131
1,634
1,676
1,768
462
446
529
502
469
463
$7,634
$8,042
$7,800
$6,319
$5,159
$6,221
Mar 12
Jun 12
Sep 12
Dec 12
Mar 13
Jun 13
Mar 12
Jun 12
Sep 12
Dec 12
Mar 13
Jun 13
Regulatory Capital Ratios
Ratio
Tier 1 Leverage
Tier 1 Risk Based
Total Risk Based
11.5%
16.3%
17.1%
14.8%
13.8%
10.4%
11.5%
15.0%
16.1%
15.7%
14.8%
13.8%
13.8%
17.3%
18.4%
17.7%
16.7%
14.2%
38 |
39
Risk-Adjusted Capital |
40
Strong Capital Position
($ in Billions)
GAAP Capital
Goodwill & Intangibles
Derivative Mark-to-Market
Unamortized Premiums from Floors
Tangible Economic Capital
Private Loan Reserve
Available Risk Capital
Risk Assets (Before Loan Loss Reserves)
Private Credit
Other Risk Assets
Total Risk Assets
Capital to Risk Assets:
Q2 13
Q1 13
Q2 12
$5.4
$5.2
$4.9
(0.5)
(0.4)
(0.4)
0.9
1.0
1.1
0.7
0.5
0.5
$6.4
$6.2
$6.2
2.2
2.2
2.1
$8.5
$8.4
$8.4
$39.3
$39.6
$38.6
1.1
1.0
1.0
$40.2
$40.6
$39.7
21.2%
20.7%
21.2%
* Tangible Economic Capital and Available Risk Capital are non-GAAP
financial measures. The reconciliation to GAAP capital is shown on this slide. |
41
Capital Allocation
SLM
allocates
capital
internally
based
on
the
risk
of
the
assets
it
supports
Assets
0.50%
12%
Capital
Allocation
0% -
15%*
Cash,
Investments,
Other Assets
10% of
Assets
Private
Education
Loans
23% of
Assets
FFELP
Loans
67% of
Assets
Based on Risk
*Other Assets includes a small amount of goodwill & intangible assets for which
capital is allocated at 100% |
42
FFELP ABS Appendix |
43
Federal Student Loan Market
Outstanding Government Student Loan Market Distribution
FFYE 9/30/2012 ($ in billions)
Source: Department of Education, U.S. Department of Education FY 2012 Agency Financial
Report FFELP owned
by ED, $147
FDLP, $494
FFELP Loans,
$291 |
44
Issue size of $0.5B to $1.5B
Tranches or pass-through denominated in
US$
AAA rated senior tranches make up to 97%
of issue structure
Floating rate tied to 1 mo. LIBOR
Amortizing tranches with 1 to 15(+) year
average lives
Master servicer is Sallie Mae, Inc.
Insurance or guarantee of underlying collateral
insulates bondholders from virtually any loss
of principal
(1)
Formerly a 20% risk-weighted asset, now a
<10% risk-weighted under Basel IIs IRB
methodology
Offer significantly higher yields than
government agency securities with
comparable risk profiles
Short (1-3 yrs), intermediate (3-7 yrs), long (7-
10 yrs) and very long (10-15+ yrs) term
tranches available at new issue and in
secondary
SLM FFELP ABS Issue Characteristics
(1) Principal and accrued interest on underlying FFELP loan collateral carry
insurance or guarantee of 97%-100% dependent on origination year and on meeting
the servicing requirements of the U.S. Department of Education.
Typical SLM FFELP ABS Transaction Features
Unique Characteristics of FFELP Loan ABS |
45
SLM Stafford/PLUS ABS Trusts
Annualized CPRs for SLM Stafford/PLUS ABS Trusts have decreased significantly as incentives
for borrowers to consolidate have declined After
a
temporary
increase
in
mid
2012
due
to
the
Special
Direct
Consolidation
Loan
program,
CPRs
decreased
in
the
fourth
quarter
Historical SLM Stafford/PLUS ABS CPRs
* Average CPR is the simple (non-weighted) average of four Quarterly CPR
calculations for each calendar year. Quarterly CPR assumes School and Grace loans are not
scheduled
to
make
payments.
Deferment,
Forbearance
and
Repayment
loans
are
scheduled
to
make
payments.
3
1
2
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
3
1
2
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
45%
50%
35%
40%
25%
30%
15%
20%
5%
10%
0%
45%
50%
35%
40%
25%
30%
15%
20%
5%
10%
0%
2002 Trusts
2003 Trusts
2004 Trusts
2005 Trusts
2006 Trusts
2007 Trusts
2008 Trusts
2010 Trusts
2012 Trusts
Prepayment Analysis
Years Since Inception
|
46
46
Historical Consolidation ABS CPRs
* Average CPR is the simple (non-weighted) average of four Quarterly CPR calculations for each
calendar year. Quarterly CPR assumes School and Grace loans are not scheduled to make payments.
Deferment, Forbearance and Repayment loans are scheduled to make payments. Prepayment
Analysis 0%
3%
5%
8%
10%
13%
15%
18%
20%
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
0%
3%
5%
8%
10%
13%
15%
18%
20%
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
2002 Trusts
2003 Trusts
2004 Trusts
2005 Trusts
2006 Trusts
2007 Trusts
2009 Trusts
2011 Trusts
SLM Consolidation ABS Trusts
Years Since Inception
CPRs for SLM Consolidation ABS Trusts have declined significantly following legislation that
prevented in-school and re-consolidation of borrowers loans
After
a
temporary
increase
in
mid
2012
due
to
the
Special
Direct
Consolidation
Loan
program,
CPRs
decreased
in
the
fourth
quarter |
47
Private Education Loan ABS Appendix |
48
SLM Private Education Loan ABS Issuance Profile
Sallie Mae is among largest issuers of ABS globally, having issued close to $267
billion in Private and FFELP ABS transactions to date
Sallie
Mae
has
been
the
market
leader
in
Private
Education
Loans
since
the
late
80s,
with expected originations of at least $4.0 billion in 2013
Prior to the financial crisis, Sallie Mae was a programmatic issuer of Private
Education Loan ABS
In 2011, Sallie Mae reestablished programmatic issuance of Private Education Loan
ABS
Executed 3 transactions in 2011 totaling $2.1 billion
Executed
5
transactions
in
2012
totaling
$4.2
billion
Executed
3
transactions
in
2013
YTD
totaling
$2.5
billion |
49
Issue size of $500M to $1.5B
Triple-A rated senior notes, Single-A rated
subordinated notes
20-30% Triple-A overcollateralization
Multiple tranches with 2, 5, and/or 7 yr
average lives
Fixed rate or floating rate tied to 1 month
LIBOR
Full-turbo structure
Collateralized by loans made to students
and parents to fund college tuition, room
and board
Underwritten using FICO, Custom
Scorecard & judgmental criteria w/risk-
based pricing
~80% with cosigners, typically a parent
Typically non-dischargeable in bankruptcy
Serviced exclusively by Sallie Mae
Recent SLM Private Education Loan ABS Characteristics
Recent SLM Private Loan ABS Structures
Collateral Characteristics |
50
SLM Private Education Loan ABS Summary
(1) Smart
Option
loans
considered
as
in
repayment
if
borrowers
are
making
either
interest
only
payments
or
principal
and
interest
payments,
regardless
of
whether
the
borrower
is
otherwise in school, grace, or deferment status.
SLM
Private
Education
Loan
ABS
Trusts
(2009-D
-
Present)
09-D
09-CT
10-A
10-B
10-C
11-A
11-B
11-C
12-A
12-B
12-C
12-D
12-E
13-A
13-B
Bond Amount ($mil)
1,680
590
1,550
869
1,701
562
825
721
547
891
1,135
640
976
1,108
1,135
Initial AAA Enhancement (%)
32%
37%
23%
45%
37%
21%
18%
24%
27%
26%
25%
25%
21%
26%
22%
Loan Program (%)
Smart Option
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
10%
20%
30%
40%
45%
48%
63%
63%
Signature/Law/MBA/Med
52%
--
76%
46%
89%
88%
91%
71%
61%
48%
43%
37%
35%
26%
29%
Consolidation
14%
--
1%
8%
11%
0%
0%
7%
6%
9%
5%
5%
5%
3%
5%
Direct to Consumer
34%
--
10%
20%
--
9%
6%
12%
12%
12%
12%
12%
12%
8%
3%
Career Training
--
100%
13%
26%
--
3%
3%
0%
1%
1%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Total
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
Payment Status (%)
(1)
School, Grace, Deferment
57%
0%
63%
12%
36%
55%
55%
45%
37%
38%
40%
39%
44%
59%
62%
Full P&I Repayment
40%
98%
32%
85%
60%
43%
43%
52%
60%
60%
57%
59%
54%
39%
36%
Forbearance
3%
2%
5%
3%
3%
2%
3%
2%
2%
2%
3%
2%
2%
2%
2%
Wtd Avg Term to Maturity (Mo.)
211
141
190
169
194
192
189
182
171
164
151
144
148
144
146
% Loans with Cosigner
64%
70%
72%
65%
62%
72%
75%
71%
75%
77%
79%
80%
80%
80%
80%
% Loans with No Cosigner
36%
30%
28%
35%
38%
28%
25%
29%
25%
23%
21%
20%
20%
20%
20%
Wtd Avg FICO at Origination
731
747
739
734
727
737
736
733
735
736
737
740
733
741
740
Wtd Avg Recent FICO at Issuance
714
725
725
732
713
723
722
720
724
726
728
730
722
733
734
WA FICO (Cosigner at Origination)
744
753
749
744
742
747
745
744
745
745
745
748
741
751
750
WA FICO (Cosigner at Rescored)
729
734
739
740
733
736
731
734
732
734
735
738
728
745
746
WA FICO (Borrower at Origination)
707
734
714
712
701
709
710
704
705
705
707
710
702
703
702
WA FICO (Borrower at Rescored)
686
703
691
716
679
690
695
688
700
700
702
698
696
683
684
Summary Information |
51
Constraining rating agency triple-A gross default stress levels at
issuance Source: Sallie Mae, Moodys, Standard & Poors,
Fitch. 0.0%
10.0%
20.0%
30.0%
40.0%
50.0%
60.0%
70.0%
27.6%
25.6%
33.9%
36.3%
54.8%
44.4%
49.8%
48.2%
52.6%
50.1%
56.8%
54.4%
59.4%
58.0%
55.7%
52.7%
49.3%
50.9%
48.2%
52.5%
52.2%
48.7%
06-A
06-C
07-A
09-A
09-B
09-C
09-D
09-CT
10-B
10-C
06-B
10-A
11-A
11-B
11-C
12-A
12-C
12-E
13-B
12-B
12-D
13-A |
Private Education ABS Trusts: Forbearance
Forbearance usage is typically highest when loans enter repayment, and declines as
loans season Use of forbearance as a collection tool peaked in early 2008;
forbearance has since declined as a result of changes in SLMs
forbearance strategy Loans in Forbearance as a Percent of Loans in Repayment and
Forbearance All Loans in SLM Trusts by Year of Issuance
25.00%
20.00%
15.00%
10.00%
5.00%
0.00%
5.00%
0.00%
10.00%
15.00%
20.00%
25.00%
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2009
2010
2011
2012
2012
2003
2002
2004
2005
2006
2007
2009
2010
2011
52 |
53
SLM Private Education ABS Trusts: 90+ Day Delinquencies
0.00%
5.00%
90+ Day Delinquencies as a Percent of Loans in Repayment
All Loans in SLM Trusts by Year of Issuance
10.00%
0.00%
5.00%
10.00%
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
Quarter since Inception
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2009
2010
2011
2012
As expected, later stage delinquency has remained elevated in recent periods due
to tightening of forbearance policy and the current economic
environment Increased
emphasis
on
cash
payment
during
delinquency
means
more
borrowers
remain
in
delinquency
instead
of receiving forbearance
Because
they
are
paying,
fewer
delinquent
borrowers
are
expected
to
default |
54
SLM Private Education ABS Trusts: Annualized Gross Charge-offs
Charge-offs have declined steadily since late 2009, after an increase resulting
from changes to forbearance policy and a weak economic environment
(1) For SLM Private Education Student Loan Trusts issued prior to 2005-B, the
servicer has the option, but not the obligation, to repurchase loans that (i) become 180+ days
delinquent and/or (ii) have a borrower who filed for bankruptcy or died. Prior to
November 1, 2008, the servicer exercised this repurchase option and actual charge-offs in these
trusts equalled zero. Beginning November 1, 2008, the servicer ceased
purchasing from the trust loans that are more than 180 days delinquent. For the purposes of comparison
across all deals, this chart reflects trust charge-offs for SLM Private
Education Student Loan Trusts issued prior to 2005-B as if the servicer had never exercised its repurchase
option.
Annualized Gross Charge-Offs as a Percent of Loans in Repayment
All Loans in SLM Trusts by Year of Issuance
Quarter since Inception
15.00%
10.00%
5.00%
0.00%
15.00%
10.00%
5.00%
0.00%
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2009
2010
2011
2012 |
55
SLM Private Education Loan Gross Defaults
As of May 31, 2013
For SLM Private Education Loan Trusts issued prior to 2005-B, the servicer has the option, but not
the obligation, to repurchase loans that (i) become 180+ days delinquent and/or (ii) have a
borrower who filed for bankruptcy or died. Prior to November 1, 2008, the servicer exercised this repurchase option and actual charge-offs in
these trusts equaled zero. Beginning November 1, 2008, the servicer ceased purchasing from the
trust loans that are more than 180 days delinquent. For the purposes of comparison across
all deals, this chart reflects trust charge-offs for SLM Private Education Loan Trusts issued prior to 2005-B as if the servicer had never exercised its
repurchase option.
(1)
Charge-offs per the servicers portfolio definition which is generally 212+ days
delinquent. Includes loans for which a borrower has filed bankruptcy which have
subsequently become 212+ days delinquent. (2)
Charge-offs due to a borrowers bankruptcy filing for which the loan is now current or paid
off.
(3)
Charge-offs due to a borrowers bankruptcy filing or death for which the loan is not current
or paid off but has not become 212+ days delinquent. These loans are in various statuses
including: bankruptcy stay, deferment, forbearance or delinquency.
Actual-to-Date Cumulative Gross Defaults
including Bankruptcy Information
All Trust Loans
24.0%
22.0%
20.0%
18.0%
16.0%
14.0%
12.0%
10.0%
8.0%
6.0%
4.0%
2.0%
0.0%
Charge-off - 212+ days delinquent (1)
Bankruptcy or death - now current or paid off .(2)
Bankruptcy or death - other (3)
11.40%
12.83%
14.10%
14.90%
16.61%
14.79%
18.38%
15.15%
15.05%
17.29%
19.19%
16.76%
9.52%
9.57%
6.54%
5.64%
5.83%
3.50%
3.20%
2.33%
2.03%
1.45%
1.15%
0.80%
0.56%
0.10%
9.47%
10.63%
11.78%
12.63%
13.93%
12.54%
15.94%
13.07%
12.97%
14.99%
16.51%
14.01%
7.00%
6.17%
5.23%
3.69%
4.66%
2.67%
2.62%
1.06%
0.83% |
56
Recoveries
Recoveries are typically realized over many years as a result of
the prevalent use of long-
term payment plans
While student loans are generally non-dischargeable in bankruptcy, the
proceedings can postpone recoveries until after borrowers emerge from
bankruptcy In 2005, Sallie Mae changed its recovery practices
The 2005 cohort had a recovery rate of 26% seven years after default
Recovery experience for more recent cohorts has varied based on economic
conditions and the characteristics of defaulted loans
In Q3 2011, Sallie Mae provided additional provision for loan loss to provide for
potential uncertainty regarding future recoveries due to continued high
unemployment rates; the 27% life-of loan recovery expectation remains
in place |
57
SLM Private Education Loan ABS Trusts
Prepayment Analysis
Historical SLM Private Education Loan ABS CPRs
Constant prepayment rates increased in 2007 due to the introduction of Private
Education Consolidation loans, then declined following SLMs decision
to suspend its consolidation loan program in 2008 14
12
10
8
6
4
2
0
2002-A
2005-B
2010-A
2012-B
2003-A
2006-A
2010-B
2012-C
2012-D
2010-C
2006-B
2003-B
2003-C
2006-C
2011-A
2012-E
2011-B
2007-A
2004-A
2004-B
2009-CT
2011-C
2012-A
2009-D
2005-A |
58
Cohort Default Triangles
(1)
Undergraduate/Graduate loans marketed under the Signature Student Loan brand.
(2)
Direct-to-Consumer Loans marketed under the Tuition Answer brand.
(3)
Career Training loans provide eligible borrowers financing at technical, trade,
K-12 or tutoring schools. The following cohort default triangles provide
loan performance information for certain Private Education Loans of
SLM
Corporation
and
its
consolidated
subsidiaries
that
meet
such
subsidiaries
current
securitization
criteria
(including those criteria listed below):
Program
types
include
Undergraduate/Graduate
(1)
,
Direct-to-Consumer
(DTC)
(2)
,
Career
Training
(3)
,
Private
Consolidation Loans and
Smart Option (interest only) loans
FICO scores are based on the greater of the borrower and cosigner scores as of a
date near the loan application and must be at least:
Excludes loans made at selected schools that have historically experienced higher
rates of default The cohort default triangles are not representative of the
characteristics of the portfolio of Private Education Loans of SLM
Corporation and its consolidated subsidiaries as a whole or any particular securitization trust
Undergraduate/Graduate
at
not-for-profit
schools:
640
Undergraduate/Graduate
at
for-profit
schools:
670
DTC
loans:
670
Career
Training
loans:
670
Private
Consolidation
loans:
640 |
59
The cohort default triangles featured on subsequent slides are segmented by loan program type,
FICO score, cosigner status, and school type
Terms and calculations used in the cohort default triangles are
defined below:
Repayment Year
The calendar year loans entered repayment
Disbursed
Principal
Entering
Repayment
The
amount
of
principal
entering
repayment in a
given year, based on disbursed principal prior to any interest capitalization
Years
in
Repayment
Measured
in
years
between
repayment
start
date
and
default
date.
Zero represents defaults that occurred prior to the start of repayment.
Periodic
Defaults
Defaulted
principal
in
each
Year
in
Repayment
as
a
percentage
of
the
disbursed principal entering repayment in each Repayment Year
Defaulted principal includes any interest capitalization that occurred prior to default
Defaulted principal is not reduced by any amounts recovered after the loan defaulted
Because the numerator includes capitalized interest while the denominator does not, default rates are
higher than if the numerator and denominator both included capitalized interest
Total
The
sum
of
Periodic
Defaults
across
Years
in
Repayment for
each
Repayment
Year
Cohort Default Triangles |
60
Cohort Default Triangles
Note: Data as of 6/30/13.
(1)
Undergraduate/Graduate loans marketed under the Signature Student Loan brand.
(2)
Periodic Defaults for the most recent two calendar Years in Repayment are for a
partial year. (3)
Numerator is the amount of principal in each cohort that defaulted in each Year in
Repayment. Denominator is the amount of disbursed principal for that Repayment Year.
Undergraduate/Graduate
(1) |
Note: Data as of 6/30/13.
(1)
Undergraduate/Graduate loans marketed under the Signature Student Loan brand.
(2)
Periodic Defaults for the most recent two calendar Years in Repayment are for a
partial year. (3)
Numerator is the amount of principal in each cohort that defaulted in each Year in
Repayment. Denominator is the amount of disbursed principal for that Repayment Year.
Cohort Default Triangles
Undergraduate/Graduate
(1)
With
Co-signer
Undergraduate/Graduate
(1)
Without
Co-signer
61 |
62
Note: Data as of 6/30/13.
(1)
Undergraduate/Graduate loans marketed under the Signature Student Loan brand.
(2)
Periodic Defaults for the most recent two calendar Years in Repayment are for a
partial year. (3)
Numerator is the amount of principal in each cohort that defaulted in each Year in
Repayment. Denominator is the amount of disbursed principal for that Repayment Year.
Undergraduate/Graduate
(1)
Non-Profit
Undergraduate/Graduate
(1)
For-Profit
Cohort Default Triangles
62 |
63
Undergraduate/Graduate
(1)
Loans, FICO 740-850
(2)
Undergraduate/Graduate
(1)
Loans, FICO 700-739
(2)
Note: Data as of 6/30/13.
(1)
Undergraduate/Graduate loans marketed under the Signature Student Loan brand.
(2)
FICO scores are based on the greater of the borrower and co-borrower scores as
of a date near the loan application. (3)
Periodic Defaults for the most recent two calendar Years in Repayment are for a
partial year. (4)
Numerator is the amount of principal in each cohort that defaulted in each Year in
Repayment. Denominator is the amount of disbursed principal for that Repayment Year.
Cohort Default Triangles
63 |
Note: Data as of 6/30/13.
(1)
Undergraduate/Graduate loans marketed under the Signature Student Loan brand.
(2)
FICO scores are based on the greater of the borrower and co-borrower scores as
of a date near the loan application. (3)
Periodic Defaults for the most recent two calendar Years in Repayment are for a
partial year. (4)
Numerator is the amount of principal in each cohort that defaulted in each Year in
Repayment. Denominator is the amount of disbursed principal for that Repayment Year.
Undergraduate/Graduate
(1)
Loans, FICO 670-699
(2)
Undergraduate/Graduate
(1)
Loans, FICO 640-669
(2)
Cohort Default Triangles
64 |
Private Consolidation Loans Without Co-signer
Private Consolidation Loans With Co-signer
Note: Data as of 6/30/13.
(1)
Periodic Defaults for the most recent two calendar Years in Repayment are for a
partial year. (2)
Numerator is the amount of principal in each cohort that defaulted in each Year in
Repayment. Denominator is the amount of disbursed principal for that Repayment Year.
Cohort Default Triangles
65 |
Note: Data as of 6/30/13.
(1)
FICO scores are based on the greater of the borrower and co-borrower scores as
of a date near the loan application. (2)
Periodic Defaults for the most recent two calendar Year sin Repayment are for a
partial year. (3)
Numerator is the amount of principal in each cohort that defaulted in each Year in
Repayment. Denominator is the amount of disbursed principal for that Repayment Year.
DTC With Co-signer, FICO
670
(1)
DTC Without Co-signer, FICO
670
(1)
Cohort Default Triangles
66 |
67
Note: Data as of 6/30/13.
(1)
FICO scores are based on the greater of the borrower and co-borrower scores as
of a date near the loan application. (2)
Periodic Defaults for the most recent two calendar Years in Repayment are for a
partial year. (3)
Numerator is the amount of principal in each cohort that defaulted in each Year in
Repayment. Denominator is the amount of disbursed principal for that Repayment Year.
Career Training Loans, 670+ FICO
(1)
Cohort Default Triangles
67 |
68
SLM Appendix |
69
GAAP to Core Earnings
Reconciliation |
70
SLM student
loan
trust
data
(Debt/asset
backed
securities
SLM
Student
Loan
Trusts)
Static pool information
Detailed portfolio stratifications by trust as of the cutoff date
Accrued interest factors
Quarterly distribution factors
Historical trust performance -
monthly charge-off, delinquency, loan status, CPR, etc. by trust
Since issued CPR
monthly CPR data by trust since issuance
SLM student
loan
performance
by
trust
Issue
details
Current and historical monthly distribution reports
Distribution factors
Current rates
Prospectus for public transactions and Rule 144A transactions are available
through underwriters Additional information (Webcasts and presentations)
Archived and historical webcasts, transcripts and investor presentations
Sallie Mae Investor Relations Website
www.salliemae.com/investors |