UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 8-K
CURRENT REPORT
Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported): November 7, 2011
SLM CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware | 001-13251 | 52-2013874 | ||
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation) |
(Commission File Number) |
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) | ||
300 Continental Drive, Newark, Delaware | 19713 | |||
(Address of principal executive offices) | (Zip Code) |
Registrants telephone number, including area code: (302) 283-8000
(Former name or former address, if changed since last report)
Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions:
¨ | Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425) |
¨ | Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12) |
¨ | Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b)) |
¨ | Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c)) |
Item 8.01 Other Events.
SLM Corporation frequently provides relevant information to its investors via posting to its corporate website. On November 7, 2011, a presentation entitled Q3 2011 Investor Presentation was made available on SLM Corporations web site at https://www1.salliemae.com/about/investors/webcasts/default.htm. In addition, the document is being furnished herewith as Exhibit 99.1.
Item 9.01 Financial Statements and Exhibits.
(d) | Exhibits. |
99.1* | Q3 2011 Investor Presentation. |
* | Furnished herewith. |
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.
SLM CORPORATION | ||||||
Date: November 7, 2011 |
By: | /s/ Jonathan C. Clark |
||||
Jonathan C. Clark | ||||||
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
EXHIBIT INDEX
Exhibit |
Description | |
99.1* | Q3 2011 Investor Presentation. |
* | Furnished herewith. |
SLM CORPORATION
Q3 2011 Investor Presentation
Exhibit 99.1 |
2
The following information is current as of November 7, 2011 (unless otherwise noted) and should
be read in connection with SLM Corporations 2010 Annual Report on Form 10-K
(the 2010 Form 10-K) and subsequent reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
SEC). Our actual results may differ materially from the forward-looking
statements and information contained in this Presentation due to a variety of factors,
including, but not limited to, those described in our 2010 Form 10-K and our second quarter Form 10-Q in Risk Factors
and in subsequent reports filed with the SEC. This Presentation
contains forward-looking statements and information based on managements current expectations as of the date of this
dependent upon future events, are forward-looking statements. Forward-looking
statements are subject to risks, uncertainties, assumptions and other factors that may
cause actual results to be materially different from those reflected in such forward-looking statements. These
factors include, among others, increases in financing costs; limits on liquidity; increases in
costs associated with compliance with laws and regulations; changes in accounting
standards and the impact of related changes in significant accounting estimates; any adverse outcomes in
any significant litigation to which we are a party; credit risk associated with our exposure
to third parties, including counterparties to our derivative transactions; and changes
in the terms of student loans and the educational credit marketplace (including changes resulting from
new laws and the implementation of existing laws). We could also be affected by, among other
things: changes in our funding costs and availability; reductions to our credit ratings
or the credit ratings of the United States of America; failures of our operating systems or
infrastructure, including those of third-party vendors; damage to our reputation; failures
to successfully implement cost-cutting and restructuring initiatives and adverse
effects of such initiatives on our business; changes in the demand for educational financing or in financing
preferences of lenders, educational institutions, students and their families; changes in law
and regulations with respect to the student lending business and financial institutions
generally; increased competition from banks and other consumer lenders; the creditworthiness of our
customers; changes in the general interest rate environment, including the rate relationships
among relevant money-market instruments and those of our earning assets versus our
funding arrangements; changes in general economic conditions; and changes in the demand for debt
management services. The preparation of our consolidated financial statements also requires
management to make certain estimates and assumptions including estimates and assumptions
about future events. These estimates or assumptions may prove to be incorrect. All forward-
looking statements contained in this Presentation are qualified by these cautionary statements
and are made only as of the date of this Presentation. We do not undertake any
obligation to update or revise these forward-looking statements to conform the statement to actual
results or changes in our expectations.
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
presentation.
Statements
that
are
not
historical
facts,
including
statements
about
our
beliefs
or
expectations
and
statements
that
assume
or are |
SLM CORPORATION
3
SLM Corporation Overview
Page 4
The U.S. Student Loan Market
Page 12
Credit Quality
Page 20
Servicing: A Competitive Advantage
Page 31
Funding Diversity and Liquidity
Page 37
Risk-Adjusted Capitalization
Page 50
FFELP Appendix
Page 53
Private Credit Appendix
Page 58
SLM Appendix
Page 82 |
SLM CORPORATION OVERVIEW |
SLM CORPORATION
#1 saving and paying for college company with 40-
years of leadership in the education lending market
#1 servicer and collector of student loans in the U.S.
servicing FFELP and Private Credit education loans
Serving 25 million unique customers, as of September
30, 2011
Servicing for third parties, including 3.4 million loans for
the Department of Education (ED), as of September
30, 2011
Fully independent private sector company with scale
and a broad franchise, traded on the NYSE (ticker: SLM)
$177
billion student loan portfolio, 80% of which is U.S.
government guaranteed, as of September 30, 2011
96% of student loans were funded with term liabilities
of various durations, as of September 30, 2011
5
1
Federal Family Education Loan Program (FFELP).
1 |
As of
September 30, 2011 Net of provision
6
As of September 30, 2011
A BRIEF CORPORATE HISTORY
1965
1965
Congress creates the Guaranteed Student Loan Program,
currently known as FFELP
1972
1972
Congress establishes, as a GSE, the Student Loan
Marketing Association or Sallie Mae
1996
1996
Privatization of Sallie Mae approved by Congress, SLM
Corporation holding company created
2004
2004
GSE dissolved
SLM Corporation becomes a fully
independent, private sector corporation
2008
2008
Challenging economy; U.S. Government support of FFELP,
private education lending curtailed
2009
2009
SLM wins 5 year contract to service for US Dept Education
Smart Option private loan introduced
FFELP eliminated in legislative reform July 2010
SLM acquires $25 billion FFELP portfolio from Student Loan
Corporation
2010
2010
SLM Corporate
Debt Ratings
Moodys
S & P
Fitch
Long
Term
Ba1
BBB
BBB-
Short
Term
Not-
Prime
A-3
F3
Outlook
Stable
Stable
Stable
-
-
-
Loan Portfolio
Loan Type
$billions
%
FFELP Loans
$140.7
80%
Private
$36.1
20%
Total Portfolio
$176.8
100%
Education |
($ millions), except
per share amounts Q3 11
Q2 11
Q3 10
EPS (Reported)
$0.36
$0.48
$0.37
Net Income
$188
$260
$202
Net Interest Income
$758
$761
$775
Loan Loss Provision
$409
$291
$358
Fee and Other Income - Excluding Debt Repurchase Gains
$198
$193
$196
Debt Repurchase Gains
-
-
$18
Operating Expenses
$285
$268
$302
Tangible Capital Ratio
2.2%
2.3%
2.0%
Average Student Loans
$178,620
$180,783
$184,139
Q3 11 CORE EARNINGS
SUMMARY
*
7
Private Credit student loan originations increased 29% year-over-year
Loan loss provision includes $124 million attributable to the adoption of new
accounting guidance for troubled debt restructurings
Credit quality continues to improve
* For a GAAP to Core Earnings reconciliation, see slide 83 |
FFELP LOAN SEGMENT EARNINGS DETAIL
($ millions)
Q3 11
Q2 11
Q3 10
Average Student Loans
$141,848
$143,999
$147,822
Net Interest Income after Provision - FFELP
$337
$342
$340
Net Interest Margin - FFELP
0.97%
0.98%
0.94%
Operating Expenses
$188
$192
$182
OpEx Annualized as a % of Average Student Loans
0.52%
0.53%
0.49%
8 |
($ millions)
Q3 11
Q2 11
Q3 10
Private Originations
$1,077
$264
$835
Average Student Loans
$36,772
$36,784
$36,317
Net Interest Income after Provision - Private
$23
$136
$79
Net Interest Margin - Private Education
4.03%
4.05%
3.87%
Operating Expenses
$82
$73
$99
OpEx Annualized as a % of Average Student Loans
0.88%
0.80%
1.08%
CONSUMER LENDING SEGMENT EARNINGS
DETAIL
9 |
THREE ASPECTS OF THE SLM BUSINESS
MODEL
Consumer Lending
Largest originator of Private Education Loans
Significant long term value
Legacy portfolio quality vastly improved
Business Services
Businesses include
loan
servicing
and
collections
for
Department
of
Education,
payment
processing for colleges and universities and 529 plan servicing
Attractive fee business with little capital required & high return on equity
ABS servicing cash flows are super senior
Opportunities exist to expand services provided, including industry consolidation
Efficient cost structure and top performer
FFELP Loan Portfolio
Existing portfolios generating substantial income and cash flow
Residuals stable due to minimal credit and interest rate risk
Actively seeking to acquire additional FFELP loan portfolios
Approximately $30 billion of FFELP assets acquired since January
2010
10 |
OFFICE OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE
OFFICER
11
Al Lord,
Chief Executive Officer
Jack Remondi, President &
Chief Operating Officer
Jonathan Clark, EVP & Chief
Financial Officer
Laurent Lutz, EVP & General
Counsel
David West, SVP & Chief
Credit Officer
April Stercula, SVP
Administration
Steve Hauber, SVP &
Chief Audit Officer |
THE U.S. STUDENT LOAN MARKET |
FAVORABLE STUDENT LOAN MARKET
TRENDS
Source: College Board
Note: Academic years, average published tuition, fees, room and board charges at four-year
institutions; enrollment-weighted
Higher Education Enrollment (millions)
Source: National Center for Education Statistics
Note: Total enrollment in all degree-granting institutions; middle alternative projections
for 2010 onward
Annual Cost of Education ($ thousands)
Source: Presidents 2012 Budget. Net commitments by fiscal year
Note: Excludes consolidation volume
Federal Student Loan Origination Volume ($ billions)
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Current Population Survey, 2010 Annual Social and Economic
Supplement. Represents median earnings for a full time, year-round worker over age
25. Unemployment data as of Dec. 2010. Represents unemployment for civilian
non-institutional population over age 25.
Unemployment
Average annual income
13
18.2
19.1
20.4
20.6
20.7
20.7
20.9
21.3
21.6
22.0
22.2
22.5
22.8
23.0
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
10.5
11.4
12.1
12.8
13.6
14.4
15.2
16.2
17.1
$26.1
$27.5
$28.7
$30.5
$32.3
$34.2
$35.5
$37.0
$38.6
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
Public
Private
45.6
51.7
55.8
58.9
64.4
75.8
94.5
104.3
116.1
124.3
131.6
139.4
147.8
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
0%
2%
4%
6%
8%
10%
12%
14%
16%
0
20,000
40,000
60,000
80,000
100,000
120,000
Less than
H.S.
High school
Some college
Associate
Bachelor's
Master's
Doctorate
Professional
Relationship Between Higher Education, Income and
Employment |
COLLEGE GRADS EXPERIENCE
LOWER LEVELS OF UNEMPLOYMENT
14
Total Unemployment Rate
Unemployment Rate with a Bachelor's Degree or Higher
Source: U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics as of 9/30/2011 |
SLM PRIVATE EDUCATION LOAN
ORIGINATIONS
15
-70%
-60%
-50%
-40%
-30%
-20%
-10%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
$0
$200
$400
$600
$800
$1,000
$1,200
3Q09
4Q09
1Q10
2Q10
3Q10
4Q10
1Q11
2Q11
3Q11
Originations
Y/Y Growth (%) |
SLMS PRIVATE EDUCATION LOAN
PORTFOLIO
Private Education Loan Portfolio Characteristics
$36 billion portfolio
20% of SLMs total student loan portfolio
Loans are based on floating interest rates, with loan margins determined
by the credit quality of the borrower and/or cosigner
Approximately 61% of portfolio has a cosigner, typically a parent
Higher education loans typically non-dischargeable in bankruptcy
Integrated underwriting, servicing and collections
16
As of September 30, 2011 |
SLMS NEW PRIVATE EDUCATION LOAN
PRODUCT
Smart
Option
Student
Loan
product
offers
three
repayment
choices
designed
to help borrowers balance their goals and budget while in school
Interest
Only
-
Requires
interest
only
payment
during
in-school
period
Fixed Repayment -
Requires $25 monthly payments during in-school period
Deferred Repayment
Allows deferred payments while the customer is in school
Repayment
term
is
driven
by
cumulative
amount
borrowed
and
grade
level
Full communication with customers during in-school period
Full collection activities employed at both the customer and cosigner level
All loans certified by the schools financial aid office to ensure that customers
borrow no more than the cost of attendance
17 |
Private
education loan products bridge the funding gap between the cost of a college education and
funds available through U.S. Department of Education (ED) programs, grants, and other
sources Estimates for academic year 2010-11 project that 20 million students will
enroll in higher education and incur costs of over $410 billion; $9 billion of that is
funded by private education loans Assuming
Federal
Loans
and
Grants
remain
constant
a
4%
increase
in
the
cost
of
education
would
result in a $15 billion incremental funding requirement for students and families
Source: College Board, Trends in College Pricing, U.S. Department of Education
2010 Cost of
attendance
gap
18
Cost of College (Based on a Four-Year Term)
Total Cost of Education (in billions)
2010/2011 Academic Year
Cost of
attendance
gap
AY 2000-2001
AY 2010-2011
ROLE OF PRIVATE EDUCATION LOAN
Source: College Board, U.S. Department of Education & Company analysis
$103 B
$109 B
$189 B
$9 B
Federal
Loans
Family
Contributions
Grants
Private
Education
Loans
$17,125
$17,125
$31,000
$31,000
$112,235
$42,588
$147,972
$64,560
Full
-Time
Private School
Full
-Time
Public School
Full
-Time
Private School
Full
-Time
Public School
ED Lending Limit
Cost of attendance gap |
PRIVATE CREDIT INDUSTRY ORIGINATIONS
2009-10 academic year market share approximately 33%
Source: College
Board,
Trends
in
Higher
Education
Series
(2010).
2009-2010
industry
data
is
preliminary. Data reported
by academic year, SLM quarterly data converted to academic year basis.
Private Education Loans declined as result of an increase in federal student loan limits, an
overall increase in the use of federal student loans as well as an increase in federal
grants.
19 |
CREDIT QUALITY |
LOAN LOSSES
+
=
Private Education
Loans
(2)
20%
U.S. Government
Guaranteed Loans
(2)
80%
Charge-Offs
(1)
= 0.06%
Charge-Offs
(1)
= 2.93%
Total Charge-Offs
(1)
= 0.64%
(1)
All data as of September 30, 2011. Annualized FFELP charge-offs as a percentage of average
FFELP loans. Annualized Private Education Loan charge-offs as a percentage of
average Private Education Loans. Annualized Total charge-offs as a percentage of average FFELP Loans and Private Education Loans.
(2)
Percentages of total student loan portfolio based upon average portfolio balances.
Student Loan
Portfolio
(2)
21 |
22
(1)
Payments due includes all periods of active repayment, whether the borrower was delinquent or
current. Also included are periods spent in deferment, although payments
are typically not due during this time. Periods in a forbearance status are not included.
(2)
Excludes Sallie Mae Smart Option, LAW, MED, MBA, and bar-study/residency loans. SLM PRIVATE CREDIT
DEFAULT EMERGENCE PROFILE PAYMENTS DUE
(1)
TRADITIONAL VS. NON-TRADITIONAL |
PRIVATE
CREDIT
DEFAULT
PERFORMANCE
23
The probability of default substantially diminishes as the number of payments and years
of seasoning increases
56%
11%
7%
5%
4%
3%
3%
3%
2%
2%
1%
1%
1%
1%
1%
56%
66%
74%
79%
83%
86%
90%
92%
94%
96%
97%
98%
99%
99%
100%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
12
24
36
48
60
72
84
96
108
120
132
144
156
168
180
# Payments Made
Defaults Per Payments Made
Cumulative Defaults
Historical Defaults by Payments Made
Historical Defaults by Months in Repayment
7%
13%
16%
13%
10%
8%
6%
5%
4%
3%
3%
3%
3%
3%
2%
7%
20%
36%
49%
59%
68%
74%
79%
83%
86%
89%
92%
95%
98%
100%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
12
24
36
48
60
72
84
96
108
120
132
144
156
168
180
Months Since Repayment Begin Date
Defaults Per Months Since Repayment Begin Date
Cumulative Defaults |
Non-Traditional loans represent approximately 10% of the Private Education Loan
portfolio but nearly a third of charge-offs
CHARGE-OFF TRENDS
MIX OF TRADITIONAL VS. NON-TRADITIONAL
24
$ Charge-offs
Charge-off rate as a % of
repayment balance |
(1)
Charge-offs as a percentage of average loans in repayment annualized for the quarters presented
PRIVATE EDUCATION LOAN PORTFOLIO
PERFORMANCE
Q3 11
Q2 11
Q1 11
Q4 10
Q3 10
Charge-offs - Traditional Portfolio
(1)
2.9%
2.8%
2.9%
3.6%
3.9%
Charge-offs - Non-Traditional Portfolio
(1)
11.5%
12.5%
13.4%
14.9%
17.6%
Charge-offs - Total Portfolio
(1)
3.7%
3.7%
3.9%
4.8%
5.4%
90+ Day Delinq as a % of Repay - Traditional Portfolio
4.0%
3.7%
4.1%
4.2%
4.5%
90+ Day Delinq as a % of Repay - Non-Traditional Portfolio
14.3%
13.2%
14.4%
15.0%
16.0%
90+ Day Delinq as a % of Repay - Total Portfolio
5.0%
4.6%
5.1%
5.3%
5.7%
Forb as a % of Forb & Repay - Traditional Portfolio
4.3%
4.5%
4.4%
4.4%
4.1%
Forb as a % of Forb & Repay - Non-Traditional Portfolio
6.7%
7.0%
6.5%
6.1%
6.1%
Forb as a % of Forb & Repay - Total Portfolio
4.5%
4.7%
4.6%
4.6%
4.3%
Allowance as a % of Loans in Repay - Traditional Portfolio
5.7%
5.2%
5.1%
4.9%
5.1%
Allowance as a % of Loans in Repay - Non-Traditional Portfolio
25.4%
24.8%
27.1%
28.2%
31.4%
Allowance as a % of Loans in Repay - Total Portfolio
7.5%
7.1%
7.2%
7.3%
7.9%
25 |
PRIVATE EDUCATION LOAN PORTFOLIO
PERFORMANCE
(1) Charge-offs as a percentage of average loans in repayment annualized for the quarters
presented Traditional
Loans
with
a
Cosigner
Q3 11
Q2 11
Q1 11
Q4 10
Q3 10
Outstanding Balance as a % of Total
59%
58%
57%
56%
56%
90+ Delinquency as a % of Repayment
2.9%
2.7%
3.0%
3.1%
3.3%
Forbearance as a % of Repayment & Forbearance
3.8%
4.0%
3.9%
4.0%
3.8%
Charge-Offs
as
a
%
of
Repayment
(1)
1.9%
1.8%
1.8%
2.0%
2.4%
Traditional
Loans
without
a
Cosigner
Q3 11
Q2 11
Q1 11
Q4 10
Q3 10
Outstanding Balance as a % of Total
32%
33%
33%
33%
33%
90+ Delinquency as a % of Repayment
5.9%
5.5%
5.9%
6.0%
6.3%
Forbearance as a % of Repayment & Forbearance
4.9%
5.1%
4.9%
4.9%
4.5%
Charge-Offs
as
a
%
of
Repayment
(1)
4.9%
4.6%
4.8%
5.1%
6.3%
Non-Traditional
Loans
with
a
Cosigner
Q3 11
Q2 11
Q1 11
Q4 10
Q3 10
Outstanding Balance as a % of Total
3%
3%
3%
3%
3%
90+ Delinquency as a % of Repayment
12.2%
11.0%
12.0%
12.6%
13.3%
Forbearance as a % of Repayment & Forbearance
7.7%
8.1%
7.5%
7.1%
7.2%
Charge-Offs
as
a
%
of
Repayment
(1)
8.0%
8.8%
9.2%
10.0%
11.5%
Non-Traditional
Loans
without
a
Cosigner
Q3 11
Q2 11
Q1 11
Q4 10
Q3 10
Outstanding Balance as a % of Total
7%
7%
7%
7%
8%
90+ Delinquency as a % of Repayment
15.1%
14.1%
15.4%
16.0%
17.1%
Forbearance as a % of Repayment & Forbearance
6.3%
6.5%
6.0%
5.7%
5.6%
Charge-Offs
as
a
%
of
Repayment
(1)
12.9%
14.0%
15.1%
17.0%
18.9%
26 |
SIGNIFICANT IMPROVEMENT IN PORTFOLIO
QUALITY
27
$ Volume in
Billions
% of Non
Traditional
% of
Cosigned
% of For
Profit
Average
Winning FICO
Actual
2008
$7.4
15%
54%
33%
709
2009
$6.6
13%
56%
27%
711
2010
$5.2
11%
59%
21%
713
Projected
(2)
2011
$3.2
10%
62%
17%
714
2012
$1.4
8%
65%
15%
719
2013
$0.6
8%
71%
11%
725
Legacy Loans Entering Repayment
(1)
Total originations in 2009 had an average winning FICO of 745 and 83% were cosigned.
Total originations in 2010 had an average winning FICO of 739 and 89% were cosigned.
Total YTD originations in 2011 had an average winning FICO of 748 and 92% were cosigned.
(1)
Excludes Smart Option loans.
(2)
Projected loans entering repayment does not include new loan originations which are
expected to be 100% Traditional loans and have significantly higher FICO
scores and cosigners. Note: Volume for all years is based on
outstanding balances. |
LOAN SEASONING
28
Dollars in millions
September 30, 2011
Traditional Portfolio
Monthly Scheduled Payments Due
Not Yet in Repayment
6,930
Loans in Forbearance
761
8.6%
169
2.9%
112
2.4%
59
1.9%
65
1.3%
1,166
4.3%
Loans in Repayment-
Current
6,937
78.7%
5,286
89.1%
4,144
90.7%
2,939
93.1%
4,671
94.6%
23,977
87.5%
Loans in Repayment-
Delinq 31-60 days
385
4.4%
172
2.9%
121
2.6%
65
2.1%
84
1.7%
827
3.0%
Loans in Repayment-
Delinq 61-90 days
198
2.2%
72
1.2%
52
1.1%
26
0.8%
35
0.7%
383
1.4%
Loans in Repayment-
Delinq 90 + days
532
6.0%
231
3.9%
142
3.1%
67
2.1%
82
1.7%
1,054
3.8%
8,813
$
100%
5,930
$
100%
4,571
$
100%
3,156
$
100%
4,937
$
100%
27,407
$
100%
Charge-offs as a % of loans in repayment
5.4%
2.6%
1.8%
1.3%
1.1%
2.9%
Non-Traditional Portfolio
Monthly Scheduled Payments Due
Not Yet in Repayment
763
Loans in Forbearance
136
11.8%
25
4.7%
15
3.6%
7
2.6%
11
2.1%
194
6.7%
Loans in Repayment-
Current
624
54.4%
371
70.1%
336
78.2%
224
82.1%
413
83.5%
1,968
68.5%
Loans in Repayment-
Delinq 31-60 days
106
9.2%
36
6.8%
25
5.8%
14
5.1%
24
4.8%
205
7.1%
Loans in Repayment-
Delinq 61-90 days
72
6.3%
21
3.9%
13
3.0%
7
2.7%
13
2.7%
126
4.4%
Loans in Repayment-
Delinq 90 + days
210
18.3%
76
14.4%
41
9.6%
21
7.5%
34
6.9%
382
13.3%
1,148
$
100%
529
$
100%
430
$
100%
273
$
100%
495
$
100%
2,875
$
100%
Charge-offs as a % of loans in repayment
18.8%
11.5%
6.1%
4.7%
3.7%
11.5%
Total Managed
Monthly Scheduled Payments Due
Not Yet in Repayment
7,693
Loans in Forbearance
897
9.0%
194
3.0%
127
2.5%
66
1.9%
76
1.4%
1,360
4.5%
Loans in Repayment-
Current
7,561
75.9%
5,657
87.6%
4,480
89.6%
3,163
92.2%
5,084
93.6%
25,945
85.7%
Loans in Repayment-
Delinq 31-60 days
491
4.9%
208
3.2%
146
2.9%
79
2.3%
108
2.0%
1,032
3.4%
Loans in Repayment-
Delinq 61-90 days
270
2.7%
93
1.4%
65
1.3%
33
1.0%
48
0.9%
509
1.7%
Loans in Repayment-
Delinq 90 + days
742
7.5%
307
4.8%
183
3.7%
88
2.6%
116
2.1%
1,436
4.7%
0
9,961
$
100%
6,459
$
100%
5,001
$
100%
3,429
$
100%
5,432
$
100%
30,282
$
100%
Charge-offs as a % of loans in repayment
6.9%
3.4%
2.2%
1.5%
1.3%
3.7%
More than 48 payments
Total
Total Loans in Repayment or Forbearance
Total Loans in Repayment or Forbearance
Loan Status
1-12 payments
13-24 payments
25-36 payments
37-48 payments
Total
Total Loans in Repayment or Forbearance
Loan Status
1-12 payments
13-24 payments
25-36 payments
37-48 payments
More than 48 payments
Total
Loan Status
1-12 payments
13-24 payments
25-36 payments
37-48 payments
More than 48 payments |
LOAN SEASONING
29
Dollars in millions
June 30, 2011
Traditional Portfolio
Monthly Scheduled Payments Due
Not Yet in Repayment
6,431
Loans in Forbearance
842
8.8%
175
2.9%
103
2.5%
50
1.7%
55
1.2%
1,225
4.5%
Loans in Repayment-
Current
7,561
79.2%
5,447
89.7%
3,801
91.0%
2,825
93.9%
4,330
95.0%
23,964
87.6%
Loans in Repayment-
Delinq 31-60 days
378
4.0%
155
2.5%
104
2.5%
52
1.7%
70
1.5%
759
2.8%
Loans in Repayment-
Delinq 61-90 days
239
2.5%
85
1.4%
53
1.3%
25
0.8%
31
0.7%
433
1.6%
Loans in Repayment-
Delinq 90 + days
529
5.5%
207
3.4%
116
2.8%
56
1.9%
70
1.5%
978
3.6%
9,549
$
100%
6,069
$
100%
4,177
$
100%
3,008
$
100%
4,556
$
100%
27,359
$
100%
Charge-offs as a % of loans in repayment
4.5%
2.7%
1.9%
1.4%
1.1%
2.8%
Non-Traditional Portfolio
Monthly Scheduled Payments Due
Not Yet in Repayment
785
Loans in Forbearance
148
11.9%
25
4.7%
15
3.7%
7
2.5%
10
2.2%
205
7.0%
Loans in Repayment-
Current
693
55.7%
397
71.4%
330
79.6%
215
83.2%
395
84.3%
2,030
69.0%
Loans in Repayment-
Delinq 31-60 days
109
8.8%
37
6.7%
23
5.6%
13
5.2%
22
4.7%
204
6.9%
Loans in Repayment-
Delinq 61-90 days
88
7.1%
23
4.2%
13
3.0%
7
2.8%
11
2.4%
142
4.8%
Loans in Repayment-
Delinq 90 + days
206
16.5%
74
13.4%
34
8.3%
17
6.7%
30
6.4%
361
12.3%
1,244
$
100%
556
$
100%
415
$
100%
259
$
100%
468
$
100%
2,942
$
100%
Charge-offs as a % of loans in repayment
18.9%
13.1%
6.7%
5.4%
5.0%
12.5%
Total Managed
Monthly Scheduled Payments Due
Not Yet in Repayment
7,216
Loans in Forbearance
990
9.2%
200
3.0%
118
2.6%
57
1.8%
65
1.3%
1,430
4.7%
Loans in Repayment-
Current
8,254
76.5%
5,844
88.2%
4,131
89.9%
3,040
93.1%
4,725
94.0%
25,994
85.8%
Loans in Repayment-
Delinq 31-60 days
487
4.5%
192
2.9%
127
2.8%
65
2.0%
92
1.8%
963
3.2%
Loans in Repayment-
Delinq 61-90 days
327
3.0%
108
1.6%
66
1.4%
32
1.0%
42
0.8%
575
1.9%
Loans in Repayment-
Delinq 90 + days
735
6.8%
281
4.2%
150
3.3%
73
2.2%
100
2.0%
1,339
4.4%
0
10,793
$
100%
6,625
$
100%
4,592
$
100%
3,267
$
100%
5,024
$
100%
30,301
$
100%
Charge-offs as a % of loans in repayment
6.2%
3.6%
2.4%
1.7%
1.5%
3.7%
More than 48 payments
Total
Total Loans in Repayment or Forbearance
Total Loans in Repayment or Forbearance
Loan Status
1-12 payments
13-24 payments
25-36 payments
37-48 payments
Total
Total Loans in Repayment or Forbearance
Loan Status
1-12 payments
13-24 payments
25-36 payments
37-48 payments
More than 48 payments
Total
Loan Status
1-12 payments
13-24 payments
25-36 payments
37-48 payments
More than 48 payments |
LOAN SEASONING
30
Dollars in millions
September 30, 2010
Traditional Portfolio
Monthly Scheduled Payments Due
Not Yet in Repayment
9,405
Loans in Forbearance
690
7.5%
140
2.6%
82
2.2%
39
1.6%
43
1.3%
994
4.1%
Loans in Repayment- Current
7,333
79.6%
4,740
89.1%
3,388
91.8%
2,294
93.9%
3,213
94.8%
20,968
87.2%
Loans in Repayment- Delinq 31-60 days
385
4.2%
146
2.7%
82
2.2%
42
1.7%
54
1.6%
709
2.9%
Loans in Repayment- Delinq 61-90 days
220
2.4%
64
1.2%
35
0.9%
19
0.8%
22
0.7%
360
1.5%
Loans in Repayment- Delinq 90 + days
588
6.4%
230
4.3%
104
2.8%
49
2.0%
55
1.6%
1,026
4.3%
9,216
$
100%
5,320
$
100%
3,691
$
100%
2,443
$
100%
3,387
$
100%
24,057
$
100%
Charge-offs as a % of loans in repayment
6.5%
3.7%
1.9%
1.5%
1.2%
3.9%
Non-Traditional Portfolio
Monthly Scheduled Payments Due
Not Yet in Repayment
1,112
Loans in Forbearance
131
9.7%
21
4.7%
10
3.0%
6
2.4%
8
1.9%
176
6.1%
Loans in Repayment- Current
754
55.9%
420
72.1%
274
79.3%
186
82.8%
324
82.2%
1,958
67.6%
Loans in Repayment- Delinq 31-60 days
114
8.5%
36
6.1%
19
5.4%
10
4.5%
19
4.8%
198
6.8%
Loans in Repayment- Delinq 61-90 days
81
6.0%
21
3.5%
10
3.0%
6
2.6%
11
2.8%
129
4.5%
Loans in Repayment- Delinq 90 + days
269
19.9%
85
14.6%
33
9.6%
17
7.5%
32
8.0%
436
15.1%
1,349
$
100%
583
$
100%
346
$
100%
225
$
100%
394
$
100%
2,897
$
100%
Charge-offs as a % of loans in repayment
25.8%
16.4%
8.2%
6.5%
5.3%
17.6%
Total Managed
Monthly Scheduled Payments Due
Not Yet in Repayment
10,517
Loans in Forbearance
821
7.8%
161
2.7%
92
2.3%
45
1.7%
51
1.4%
1,170
4.3%
Loans in Repayment- Current
8,087
76.5%
5,160
87.4%
3,662
90.7%
2,480
92.9%
3,537
93.6%
22,926
85.1%
Loans in Repayment- Delinq 31-60 days
499
4.7%
182
3.1%
101
2.5%
52
1.9%
73
1.9%
907
3.4%
Loans in Repayment- Delinq 61-90 days
301
2.8%
85
1.4%
45
1.1%
25
0.9%
33
0.9%
489
1.8%
Loans in Repayment- Delinq 90 + days
857
8.1%
315
5.3%
137
3.4%
66
2.5%
87
2.3%
1,462
5.4%
0
10,565
$
100%
5,903
$
100%
4,037
$
100%
2,668
$
100%
3,781
$
100%
26,954
$
100%
Charge-offs as a % of loans in repayment
9.0%
5.0%
2.4%
1.9%
1.6%
5.4%
More than 48 payments
Total
Total Loans in Repayment or Forbearance
Total Loans in Repayment or Forbearance
Loan Status
1-12 payments
13-24 payments
25-36 payments
37-48 payments
Total
Total Loans in Repayment or Forbearance
Loan Status
1-12 payments
13-24 payments
25-36 payments
37-48 payments
More than 48 payments
Total
Loan Status
1-12 payments
13-24 payments
25-36 payments
37-48 payments
More than 48 payments |
SERVICING: A COMPETITIVE
ADVANTAGE |
BUSINESS SERVICES SEGMENT
32
Core Earnings
Revenue of $337 million in Q3 2011
More than 78% of revenue generated by FFELP servicing and contingent
collections
ED servicing and collections businesses will grow organically with federal
Direct Lending, added focus on increasing market share through performance
Growth
in
529
account
asset
servicing
and
transaction
processing
is
key
objective
Plan
to
leverage
campus
relationships
and
servicing
capabilities
to
grow
Campus Solutions processing business |
($ millions)
Q3 11
Q2 11
Q3 10
Intercompany loan servicing
$183
$187
$164
Third-party loan servicing
$20
$20
$20
Guarantor servicing
$15
$15
$16
Other servicing
$24
$22
$23
Contingency revenue
$84
$86
$84
Other Business Services revenue
$11
$11
$13
BUSINESS SERVICES SEGMENT EARNINGS
DETAIL
33 |
SLMS COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE
SLM has a distinct competitive advantage in all facets of the
education loan market.
34
Best in Class
Vertically Integrated
Origination/
Servicing/Collections
Strongest National
Brand in
Education
with Consumers
and Schools
State-of-the-Art
Loan Delivery Platform
Largest & Most
Experienced
Sales Team
Breadth of
Products & Services
Over $238B
Serviced,
25
million
Customers
Economies of Scale
Singular Focus
&
Scale |
OPERATIONS LOCATIONS
35
Fishers, IN
Collections
Information Technology
Servicing
Fulfillment
Call Center
Sales
Reston, VA
Finance
Legal
Information Technology
New York State
Arcade, Perry,
Horseheads
Collections
Cincinnati, OH
(GRC)
Collections
Murray, UT
Sallie Mae Bank
Wilkes-Barre, PA
Servicing
Call Center
Newark, DE Headquarters
Credit &Collections
Customer Resolution Srvcs
Servicing
Fraud
Business Development
Washington, DC
Government Relations
Moorestown, NJ
Collections
Corporate Headquarters
Newton, MA
Upromise
Business
Development
Kansas City, MO
Upromise
Campus Solutions
Muncie, IN
Collections |
SLM PRIVATE EDUCATION LOAN COLLECTIONS
Sallie Mae services and collects the vast majority of
loans in its Private Education Loan portfolio
Private Education Loan collections are conducted by a
stand-alone consumer credit collections unit, separate
from the companys FFELP collections operations
Private Education Loan collections are managed by
individuals with extensive experience managing
collections operations for credit cards and other
consumer loans
Over the past two years, Private Education Loan
collections technology and practices have been
enhanced
Multi-variable analysis has enabled prioritization
of collection efforts on higher risk borrowers
Forbearance policies have been enhanced to
reduce reliance on forbearance as a collection
tool, while still meeting customer needs during
an economic downturn
Additional workout and settlement programs
have been introduced to help customers avoid
default
Collection workstations, dialer capabilities, and
internet utilities have all been enhanced with
more effective technology solutions
Sallie Mae Private Education Loans are charged-off at
the end of the month if the loan exceeds 212 days past
due
Overview
Collection Philosophy and Fundamentals
Segmented Collection Practices by Risk Tier
Determine optimal contact channel based on
borrowers preferences and risk profile. Channels
include letter, phone, email, text messaging, Internet
Phone attempts begin at 5-15 days past due
Simultaneous collections efforts on borrower and
cosigner
For lowest risk segments, contact begins at 30 days
due to high self-cure rates
In high risk segments, communication begins before
repayment to notify borrower of obligation coming due
Delinquency is reported to credit bureaus for borrower
and co-signer beginning at 45 days past due and
monthly thereafter, with no reporting for loans in
forbearance
Focus on account ownership by collectors for middle
and late stage accounts
Tenured collectors assigned to higher risk accounts
Credit reports reviewed as part of repayment
negotiation
Locate and make contact with the borrower and/or co-
signer simultaneously
Understand and document each borrowers unique
circumstance and reason for delinquency
Secure and understand how they can stay up-to-date
once cured from delinquency
Document each account and update demographic and
employment information
Focus on cash collections as the primary account
resolution approach
36 |
FUNDING DIVERSITY AND
LIQUIDITY |
2011 Q3 CAPITAL MARKETS SUMMARY
On October 5 the company closed on a $3.4 billion ABCP facility which matures in
January 2014.
Paid dividend of $0.10 per common share.
Repurchased 9.5 million shares on the open market which concluded our
previously announced $300 million share repurchase program.
Repurchased $9 million of unsecured debt.
38
th |
Private Education Loans
Consolidation FFELP
Private Education Loans
Issue
$0.6B SLM Trust 2011-A
$0.8B SLM Trust 2011-2
$0.8B SLM Trust 2011-B
Pricing Date
April 14, 2011
May 26, 2011
June 15, 2011
Collateral
Private Education Loans
US Govt. Guaranteed FFELP
Consolidation Loans
Private Education Loans
Prepayment
Speed
(1)
4%
100% Consolidation Loan Ramp
4%
Tranching
Moodys
Amt
AL
(1)
Pricing
(2)
A-1 Aaa
$287 2.0 L+100
A-2 Aaa
$175 5.1 4.41%
A-3 Aaa
$100 6.9 L+250
Moodys
Amt
AL
(1)
Pricing
(3)
A-1 Aaa
$622 3.9 L+65
A-2 Aaa
$175 11.2 L+120
B
A3 $24 13.8 L+391
Moodys
Amt
AL
(1)
Pricing
(2)
A-1 Aaa
$400 2.0 L+90
A-2 Aaa
$300 5.3 3.78%
A-3 Aaa
$125 7.3 L+250 39
(1)
Estimated based on a variety of assumptions concerning loan repayment behavior, as more fully
described in the related prospectus,
which may be obtained at http://www2.salliemae.com/investors/debtasset/slmsltrusts/.
Actual average life may vary significantly from estimates.
(2)
Pricing represents the yield to expected maturity.
(3)
Pricing represents the discount margin to the 10% optional redemption date.
RECENT ABS TRANSACTIONS |
Employ conservative long-term funding model
HIGH PERCENTAGE OF STUDENT LOANS
FUNDED TO TERM
40
$177 Billion Student Loan Portfolio as of
September 30, 2011
Fixed Spread
Liabilities with
Average Life of
5.0 years, 7%
ABCP Conduit
& FHLB, 4%
Funded to
Term*, 89%
$182 Billion Student Loan Portfolio as of
September 30, 2010
Fixed Spread
Liabilities with
Average Life of
4.8 years, 7%
ABCP Conduit
& FHLB, 4%
Funded to
Term*, 89%
* Funded to Term includes 12% or $21.8 billion of student loans funded under the
Straight A Funding Facility as of September 30, 2011 and 20% or $35.7 billion of
student loans funded under the ED Purchase and Participation Program and Straight A
Funding Facility as of September 30, 2010. |
SLM ASSET-BACKED FUNDING
SLM ABS Term Issuance Volume
(1)
Reported at quarter closing dates, net of paydowns.
(2)
Balances inclusive of FFELP and legacy private ABCP, legacy UBS Phoenix facility, FHLB Des
Moines and seller financing for the SLC acquisition.
41
SLM Secured Funding
ABS Issuance ($ in billions)
Q3 11
Q2 11
Q1 11
2010
2009
2008
Non-Consolidation FFELP ABS
$
-
$
-
$
- $
2.0
$
- $ 18.5
Consolidation FFELP ABS
-
0.8
0.8
-
5.9
-
Private Credit ABS
-
1.4
-
4.2
7.5
-
Total ABS Issuance
$
2.2
$
0.8 $ 6.2
$
13.4 $ 18.5
Secured Borrowings ($ in billions)
Q3 11
Q2 11
Q1 11
2010
2009
2008
Net ED Participation Program
(1)
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$ 9.0
$
7.4 Straight
A Funding Facility
22.0
22.8
23.6
24.5
14.3
-
ABCP & Other Secured Facilities
(2)
7.2
7.3
6.6
7.9
8.8
24.8
Total Asset Funding
$ 29.2
$ 30.1
$ 30.2
$ 32.4
$ 32.1
$ 32.2
|
SLM CORPORATE DEBT ACTIVITY
SLM Corporate Debt Issuance Volume
SLM Corporate Debt Repurchases
Note: Total may not foot due to rounding.
(1)
US$ equivalent at the time of issuance
(2)
Face value amounts repurchased
42
SLM Senior Unsecured Debt Outstanding
Issuance Type (US$ in billions)
2011
2010
2009
2008
2007
US$ Global & Medium Term Notes
$ 2.0
$ 1.5
$ -
$ 2.5
$ 1.4
Foreign Currency Denominated
(1)
-
-
-
-
0.2
Extendible Notes
-
-
-
-
-
Retail Note Program
-
-
-
-
-
Total Corporate Debt Issuance
$ 2.0
$ 1.5
$ -
$ 2.5
$ 1.6
Denomination (US$ in millions)
Q3 11
Q2 11
Q1 11
2010
2009
USD
(2)
$ 9
$ 57
$ 775
$ 1,387
$ 2,169
Foreign Currency Denominated
(2)
-
3
50
3,481
1,278
Total
(2)
$ 9
$ 60
$ 825
$ 4,868
$ 3,447
Accounting Gain Generated
$ -
$ 0.5
$ 64
$ 317
$ 536 |
Note:
Does not include Sallie Mae Bank or Subsidiary funding
Repurchased $894 million of debt YTD Q311
Repurchased $4.9 billion of debt in 2010
UNSECURED DEBT MATURITIES
43
$2.1
$1.8
$2.3
$3.0
$0.7
$2.3
$0.2
$2.8
$3.8
$0
$1
$2
$3
$4
$5
As of September 30, 2011
(par value, $ in billions) |
UNENCUMBERED ASSETS & UNSECURED
DEBT
44
The difference between unencumbered
assets and outstanding unsecured debt continues to diminish
($ in billions)
9/30/11
12/31/10
12/31/09
12/31/08
FFELP Stafford and Plus Loans, net
$
$
$
$
FFELP Consolidation Loans, net
0.2
0.5
0.5
1.6
Private Education Loans, net
11.0
11.1
12.5
15.7
Other Loans
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.7
Available Cash & Investments
4.9
5.3
8.1
5.1
Retained Interests*
-
-
1.8
2.2
Other Assets
4.6
4.1
5.2
5.8
Total Unencumbered Tangible Assets
$
$
$
$
Unsecured Debt Outstanding
$
$
$
$
Unencumbered Assets & Unsecured Debt
* On 1/1/10, upon adopting ASC 810, the Retained Interests were removed from the
consolidated balance sheet and the assets and liabilities of off-balance sheet ABS
were consolidated onto the balance sheet. ** Amounts include loans, cash, and accrued
interest receivable less debt outstanding for all secured borrowing facilities. Amounts
reflect the current balance and prior period adjustments made to account for the impact
of ASC 815. Further detail of the nature of the adjustment can be found in the 3Q
2011 SLM Corporation Supplemental Earnings Disclosure. 1.0
1.6
35.1
30.1
34.9
42.1
Net Assets in Secured Financing
Facilities
9/30/11
12/31/10
12/31/09
12/31/08
Off-Balance Sheet ABS (Non-GAAP)*
$ -
$ -
$ 0.6
$ 0.9
On-Balance Sheet ABS (GAAP)**
12.7
13.1
12.7
13.4
Total
$
$
$
$
12.7
13.1
13.3
14.3
21.7
25.5
22.3
26.9
0.8
3.8 |
45
Note: Totals may not add due to rounding
*
Net residual represents excess distribution, net of payments on floor contracts and receipts
from basis swaps (1)
2008
2010 APBs are an average of 4 quarterly 2-point averages.
(2)
Interest to be capitalized not available for On-Balance Sheet Indentured Trust balance
YTD
9/30/11
2010
2009
2008
Servicing (Cash Paid)
$ 426
$ 533
$ 549
$ 525
Net Residual* (Excess Distributions)
523
746
1,435
1,338
Net Cash Flow
496
1,465
1,296
589
$ 1,445
$ 2,743
$ 3,280
$ 2,452
Servicing (Cash Paid)
$ 143
$ 179
$ 130
$ 97
Residual (Excess Distribution)
6
8
90
403
Net Cash Flow
-
-
58
81
$ 149
$ 187
$ 278
$ 581
$ 1,594
$ 2,930
$ 3,558
$ 3,033
YTD
9/30/11
2010
2009
2008
$ 94,414
$ 99,041
$ 102,754
$ 97,363
45,868
38,767
36,628
32,543
$ 140,282
$ 137,808
$ 139,382
$ 129,906
$ 25,761
$ 25,854
$ 19,144
$ 14,505
-
-
2,641
2,641
$ 25,761
$ 25,854
$ 21,785
$ 17,146
$ 166,043
$ 163,661
$ 161,167
$ 147,052
Total Private Credit
Total FFELP and Private Credit
Term FFELP
Other Secured FFELP
(2)
Total FFELP
Private Credit
Term PC
Other Secured Financings
FFELP
FFELP
Term Securitized
Other Secured FFELP
Total FFELP
Private Credit
Term Securitized
Other Secured Financings
Total Private Credit
Total FFELP and Private Credit
Average Principal Balances
(1)
$ in Millions
SECURED CASH FLOW |
as of
9/30/11 Q411
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
Projected FFELP Average Balance
$137,617
$132,539
$123,459
$112,860
$102,453
$92,779
$83,004
Projected Excess Spread
$220
$833
$811
$748
$683
$635
$607
Projected Servicing Revenue
$185
$710
$659
$601
$545
$486
$429
Projected Total Revenue
$404
$1,543
$1,470
$1,350
$1,228
$1,122
$1,036
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Projected FFELP Average Balance
$73,613
$64,590
$55,895
$48,002
$41,842
$36,521
$31,458
$26,560
Projected Excess Spread
$657
$588
$512
$436
$354
$312
$278
$254
Projected Servicing Revenue
$373
$319
$267
$223
$193
$167
$143
$120
Projected Total Revenue
$1,030
$907
$779
$659
$547
$479
$422
$374
2026
2027
2028
2029
2030
2031
2032
2033
Projected FFELP Average Balance
$21,849
$17,313
$13,255
$10,117
$7,688
$5,604
$3,716
$2,088
Projected Excess Spread
$221
$183
$149
$118
$96
$74
$51
$27
Projected Servicing Revenue
$98
$77
$59
$45
$35
$25
$16
$9
Projected Total Revenue
$319
$260
$208
$164
$131
$99
$67
$36
Assumptions
CP/LIBOR = 10 basis points, No Floor Income, CPR/CDR = Stafford & Plus (5.5%),
Consolidation (2.5%) * These projections are based on internal estimates and assumptions
and are subject to ongoing review and modification. These projections may prove to be incorrect.
46
($ in Millions)
Total Cash Flows from Projected Excess Spread = $8.8 Billion
Total Cash Flows from Projected Servicing Revenues = $5.8 Billion
PROJECTED
CASH
FLOWS
FROM
FFELP
PORTFOLIO
* |
CP -
LIBOR BASIS
47
Q3 FFELP CP Index Loan Funding By Index
$ Volume in Billions
Average Rate
Spread to CP
1 month LIBOR
$27
0.21%
-0.01
Conduit Facilities
$29
0.22%
-0.02
3 month LIBOR
$38
0.30%
-0.10
FFELP Assets indexed to 90 day CP total
$133 billion
$38 billion of CP indexed loans are fixed
rate consolidation loans with no basis risk
in the current interest rate environment
$56 billion of CP indexed loans are
funded with one month LIBOR or
liabilities more closely correlated to one
month than three month LIBOR
One month LIBOR is less volatile than
three month LIBOR and more correlated
to 90 day CP index during periods of
market stress
90 Day CP Yield, 3 Month LIBOR and 1 Month LIBOR rates provided by Bloomberg
$ volume is based on average balances. As of 9/30/11
Numbers may not add due to rounding
Average Quarterly Spread
CP -
LIBOR
CP Yield -
3MLibor
CP Yield -
1MLibor |
SALLIE MAE BANK
Utah based ILC regulated by FDIC and Utah Department of Financial Institutions
(UDFI)
Charter granted October 2005
Originates Sallie Maes private education loans
Funded through affiliate and brokered deposits and a direct retail deposit program
launched in Feb 2010
21.4% Total Risk-based Capital at September 30, 2011
Dividend of $400 million paid in October 2010
Strong cash position used to fund Private Credit originations
Deposits totaled $5.7 billion at September 30, 2011
$3.8 billion Brokered Deposits
$1.9 billion Direct Retail and other affiliate and non-affiliate Deposits
Brokered Deposit term portfolio has a weighted average maturity of 16.8 months
Total deposits increased by 10.9% in 3Q11 due primarily to increases in the
brokered money market account with Merrill Lynch and the retail deposit portfolio
48
Bank charter
Current bank activity
Deposit taking activities |
SALLIE MAE BANK
CAPITAL & DEPOSITS
*Primarily affiliate deposit accounts with no stated maturities
49
Bank Deposits
($ millions)
Sep 11
Jun 11
Mar 11
Dec 10
Sep 10
Jun 10
Brokered CDs
$3,262
$3,262
$4,177
$4,604
$4,961
$5,023
Brokered
Other
519
284
273
274
234
190
Retail Deposits
1,435
1,199
1,222
1,090
838
242
Other Deposits*
529
436
461
458
542
441
Total Deposits
$5,745
$5,181
$6,133
$6,426
$6,575
$5,896
Regulatory Capital Ratios
Ratio
Sep 11
Jun 11
Mar 11
Dec 10
Sep 10
Jun 10
Tier 1 Leverage
16.4%
15.3%
12.9%
12.1%
16.7%
17.2%
Tier 1 Risk Based
20.3%
23.1%
17.0%
18.7%
26.7%
30.4%
Total Risk Based
21.4%
24.4%
18.3%
19.7%
27.7%
31.4% |
RISK-ADJUSTED CAPITALIZATION |
CAPITALIZATION
SLM Corporation
51
3Q11
2010
2009
2008
Tangible Equity/Core Earnings
Assets
(1)
2.2%
2.2%
2.0%
1.8%
Tangible Equity/Charge-Offs
(2)
4x
3x
3x
7x
(1)
GAAP tangible stockholders equity as a percentage of total Core Earnings
assets.
(2)
Average GAAP tangible equity including preferred stock to charge-offs. SLM charge-offs
based on total Core Earnings loans, annualized. |
CAPITAL ALLOCATION
SLM
allocates
capital
internally
based
on
the
risk
of
the
assets
it
supports
SLM Corp
Assets
Capital
Allocation
Private
Education
Loans
18% of
Assets
Government
Guaranteed
Loan Assets
71% of
Assets
Based on Risk
52
*Other Assets includes a small amount of goodwill & intangibles for which capital is
allocated at 100% Cash,
Investments,
Other Assets
11% of
Assets
0.50%
12%
0% -
15%* |
FFELP APPENDIX |
Outstanding
Government Student Loan Market Distribution
FFYE 9/30/2010 ($ in billions)
Top 10 Holders of FFELP Loans
FFYE 9/30/2010 ($ in millions)
Sources: Presidents FY 2012 Budget, US Department of Education Report 4/2011
1
Includes $26.1 billion of FFELP Loans Purchased from the Student Loan Corporation on December
31, 2010 2
Student Loan Xpress is a CIT company
54
FEDERAL STUDENT LOAN MARKET
FDLP, $221
FFELP ABS,
$237
FFELP
Straight -
A, $38
FFELP
Loans,
$151
FFELP
owned by
ED, $110
Lender Name
FY10
SLM CORPORATION
$148,649
1
NELNET
$24,514
WELLS FARGO
$20,722
BRAZOS GROUP
$12,080
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK
$9,616
PA HIGHER ED ASST AUTH (PHEAA)
$9,575
COLLEGE LOAN CORP
$8,669
CIT
2
$8,317
PNC
$7,549
Goal Financial
$6,881
Top 10 Holders
$256,572 |
SLM FFELP ABS ISSUE CHARACTERISTICS
Issue size of $0.5B to $1.0B
Tranches or pass-through
denominated in US$
AAA rated senior tranches make up
to 97% of issue structure
Floating rate tied to 1 mo. LIBOR
Amortizing tranches, with 1 to
15(+) year average lives
Masterservicer is Sallie Mae, Inc.
Explicit U.S. government guarantee
of underlying collateral insulates
bondholders from virtually any loss
of principal
(1)
Formerly a 20% risk-weighted
asset, now a <10% risk-weighted
under Basel IIs IRB methodology
Offer significantly higher spreads
than government agency securities
with comparable risk profiles
Short (1-3 yrs), intermediate (3-7
yrs), long (7-10 yrs) and very long
(10-15+ yrs) term tranches
available at new issue and in
secondary
(1) Principal and accrued interest on underlying FFELP loan collateral carry a guarantee of
97%-100% dependent on origination year and on meeting the servicing requirements of
the U.S. Department of Education. Typical SLM FFELP ABS Transaction Features
Unique Characteristics of FFELP Loan ABS
55 |
SLM STAFFORD/PLUS ABS TRUSTS
PREPAYMENT ANALYSIS
Annualized CPRs for SLM Stafford/PLUS ABS Trusts have decreased
significantly as incentives for borrowers to consolidate have declined
Historical SLM Stafford/PLUS ABS CPRs
56
Years Since Inception
* Average CPR is the simple (non-weighted) average of four Quarterly CPR calculations for
each calendar year. Quarterly CPR assumes School and Grace loans are not
scheduled to make payments. Deferment, Forbearance and Repayment loans are scheduled to make payments. |
SLM CONSOLIDATION ABS TRUSTS
PREPAYMENT ANALYSIS
Historical Consolidation ABS CPRs
* Average CPR is the simple (non-weighted) average of four Quarterly CPR
calculations for each calendar year. Quarterly CPR assumes School and Grace loans are
not scheduled to make payments. Deferment, Forbearance and Repayment loans are
scheduled to make payments. 57
CPRs for SLM Consolidation ABS Trusts have declined significantly following
legislation that prevented in-school and re-consolidation of borrowers
loans |
PRIVATE CREDIT APPENDIX |
RECENT SLM PRIVATE EDUCATION LOAN ABS
CHARACTERISTICS
Issue size of $500M to $1.0B
Triple-A rated senior notes only; no
subordinate tranches
Credit enhancement comprised of
overcollateralization and a reserve
account
Multiple tranches with 1-7(+) yr
average lives
Both fixed and floating rate issuance
tied to 1 mo. LIBOR
Private education loans made to
students and parents to fund college
tuition, room and board
Floating rate tied to LIBOR or Prime
Underwritten using FICO, Custom
Scorecard & DTI w/risk-based pricing
70(+)% with co-borrowers, typically a
parent
Typically non-dischargeable in
bankruptcy
Serviced exclusively by Sallie Mae
Recent SLM Private Loan ABS Structures
Collateral Characteristics
59 |
SLM PRIVATE EDUCATION LOAN GROSS
DEFAULTS
60
As of August 31, 2011
8.43%
9.22%
10.00%
10.88%
11.94%
10.20%
12.93%
9.86%
9.32%
11.02%
12.23%
9.06%
4.05%
4.01%
2.99%
4.16%
3.44%
1.38%
2.94%
1.00%
1.40%
0.00%
0.00%
10.01%
11.05%
11.87%
12.71%
14.11%
11.96%
14.89%
11.48%
10.87%
12.77%
14.24%
11.07%
5.52%
5.68%
4.47%
6.15%
5.78%
2.02%
4.20%
1.84%
1.90%
0.13%
0.06%
0.0%
5.0%
10.0%
15.0%
20.0%
25.0%
30.0%
35.0%
2002-A
2003-A
2003-B
2003-C
2004-A
2004-B
2005-A
2005-B
2006-A
2006-B
2006-C
2007-A
2009-B
2009-C
2009-D
2009-
CTL
2009-
CTP
2010-
AL
2010-
AP
2010-B
2010-C
2011-A
2011-B
Actual-to-Date Cumulative Gross Defaults,
including Bankruptcy Information
All Trust Loans
Bankruptcy or death -
other (3)
Bankruptcy or death -
now current or paid off (2)
Charge
-
off -
212+ days delinquent (1)
For SLM Private Education Loan Trusts issued prior to 2005-B, the servicer has the option,
but not the obligation, to repurchase loans that (i) become 180+ days delinquent and/or
(ii) have a borrower who filed for bankruptcy or died. Prior to November 1, 2008, the servicer exercised this repurchase option and actual charge-offs in these
trusts equaled zero. Beginning November 1, 2008, the servicer ceased purchasing from the
trust loans that are more than 180 days delinquent. For the purposes of
comparison across all deals, this chart reflects trust charge-offs for SLM Private
Education Loan Trusts issued prior to 2005-B as if the servicer had never exercised its
repurchase option.
(1)
Charge-offs per the servicers portfolio definition which is generally 212+ days
delinquent. Includes loans for which a borrower has filed bankruptcy which have
subsequently become 212+ days delinquent.
(2)
Charge-offs due to a borrowers bankruptcy filing for which the loan is now current
or paid off.
(3)
Charge-offs due to a borrowers bankruptcy filing or death for which the loan is not
current or paid off but has not become 212+ days delinquent. These loans are in
various statuses including: bankruptcy stay, deferment, forbearance or
delinquency. |
SLM PRIVATE CREDIT GROSS DEFAULTS
CONSTRAINING RATING AGENCY STRESS LEVELS AT ISSUANCE
As of September 30, 2011
2011-A and 2011-B default rates are expressed as a proportion of repayment
balance. 61
Constraining Rating Agency Stress Levels at Issuance for 'AAA
|
PRIVATE CREDIT ABS TRUSTS
FORBEARANCE
62
Forbearance usage is typically highest when loans enter repayment, and
declines as loans season
Use of forbearance as a collection tool peaked in early 2008; forbearance
has since declined as a result of changes in SLMs forbearance strategy
|
PRIVATE CREDIT ABS TRUSTS
31-60 DAY DELINQUENCIES
63
Early stage delinquencies remained relatively steady through 2009
and 2010 even as unemployment increased |
PRIVATE CREDIT ABS TRUSTS
61-90 DAY DELINQUENCIES
64
Delinquencies show seasonal trends associated with groups of borrowers entering
repayment at the same time after the grace period following graduation
Delinquency has continued to improve since 2009 |
PRIVATE CREDIT ABS TRUSTS
90+ DAY DELINQUENCIES
65
As expected, later stage delinquency has remained elevated in recent periods due
to tightening of forbearance and the current economic environment
Increased emphasis on cash payment during delinquency means more
borrowers
remain in delinquency instead of receiving forbearance
Because they are paying, fewer delinquent borrowers are expected
to default |
Charge-offs decline in the latter half of 2009, after an increase
resulting from changes to forbearance policy
66
0.0%
2.0%
4.0%
6.0%
8.0%
10.0%
14.0%
Quarters Since Inception
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2009
2010
2011
12.0%
Annualized Gross Charge-Offs as a Percent of Loans in Repayment
All Loans in SLM Trusts by Year of Issuance
0.0%
2.0%
4.0%
6.0%
8.0%
10.0%
12.0%
14.0%
PRIVATE CREDIT ABS TRUSTS
ANNUALIZED GROSS CHARGE-OFFS
(1) For SLM Private Credit Student Loan Trusts issued prior to 2005-B, the servicer has the
option, but not the obligation, to repurchase loans that (i) become 180+ days delinquent and/or (ii) have a
borrower who filed for bankruptcy or died . Prior to November 1, 2008, the servicer
exercised this repurchase option and actual charge-offs in these trusts equaled zero. Beginning November 1, 2008,
the servicer ceased purchasing from the trust loans that are more than 180 days
delinquent. For the purposes of comparison across all deals, this chart reflects trust charge-offs for SLM Private Credit
Student Loan Trusts issued prior to 2005-B as if the servicer had never exercised its
repurchase option. |
(1) For SLM
Private Credit Student Loan Trusts issued prior to 2005-B, the servicer has the option, but not the obligation, to repurchase loans that (i) become 180+ days delinquent
and/or (ii) have a borrower who filed for bankruptcy or died . Prior to November 1,
2008, the servicer exercised this repurchase option and actual charge-offs in these trusts equaled
zero. Beginning November 1, 2008, the servicer ceased purchasing from the trust loans
that are more than 180 days delinquent. For the purposes of comparison across all deals,
this chart reflects trust charge-offs for SLM Private Credit Student Loan Trusts issued
prior to 2005-B as if the servicer had never exercised its repurchase option.
67
The decline in forbearance resulted in:
Increased defaults in mid 2009
A more front loaded default curve
No increase in lifetime defaults
Cumulative Gross Charge-Offs as a Percent of Original Pool Balance
All Loans in SLM Trusts by Year of Issuance
0.0%
2.0%
4.0%
6.0%
8.0%
10.0%
12.0%
14.0%
16.0%
18.0%
0.0%
2.0%
4.0%
6.0%
8.0%
10.0%
12.0%
14.0%
16.0%
18.0%
Quarters Since Inception
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2009
2010
2011
PRIVATE CREDIT ABS TRUSTS
HISTORICAL
CUMULATIVE
GROSS
CHARGE-OFFS
(1) |
Historical SLM
Private Credit ABS CPRs Constant prepayment rates increased in 2007 due to the
introduction of Private Credit Consolidation loans, but then declined accordingly
following SLMs decision to suspend its consolidation loan program
68
2002-A
2003-A
2003-B
2003-C
2004-A
2004-B
2005-A
2005-B
2006-A
2006-B
2006-C
2007-A
2009-B
2009-C
2009-D
2009-CTL
2009-CTP
2010-AL
2010-AP
2010-B
2010-C
2011-A
1.0%
2.0%
3.0%
4.0%
5.0%
6.0%
7.0%
8.0%
9.0%
10.0%
11.0%
12.0%
13.0%
14.0%
15.0%
0.0%
SLM PRIVATE CREDIT ABS TRUSTS
PREPAYMENT ANALYSIS |
The
following cohort default triangles provide loan performance information for certain
private education loans of SLM Corporation and its consolidated subsidiaries that
meet such subsidiaries
current securitization criteria (including those criteria listed
below):
Program types include Undergraduate/Graduate
(1)
, Direct-to-Consumer (DTC)
(2)
, Career
Training
(3)
,
Private
Consolidation
Loans
and
Smart
Option
(interest
only)
loans
FICO scores are based on the greater of the borrower and co-borrower scores as
of a date near the loan application and must be at least:
Undergraduate/Graduate at not-for-profit schools:
640
Undergraduate/Graduate at for-profit schools:
670
DTC loans:
670
Career Training loans:
670
Private Consolidation loans:
640
Excludes loans made at selected schools that have historically experienced higher
rates of default
The cohort default triangles are not representative of the characteristics of the
portfolio of private education loans of SLM Corporation and its consolidated
subsidiaries as a whole or any particular securitization trust
COHORT DEFAULT TRIANGLES
69
(1)
Undergraduate/Graduate loans marketed under the Signature Student Loan
brand. (2)
Direct-to-Consumer Loans marketed under the Tuition Answer brand.
(3)
Career Training loans provide eligible borrowers financing at technical , trade,
K-12 or tutoring schools. |
The
cohort default triangles featured on subsequent slides are segmented by loan program type,
FICO score, co-borrower status, and school type
Terms and calculations used in the cohort default triangles are defined
below: Repayment
Year
The
calendar
year
loans
entered
repayment
Disbursed
Principal
Entering
Repayment
The
amount
of
principal
entering
repayment
in
a
given year, based on disbursed principal prior to any interest
capitalization Years
in
Repayment
Measured
in
years
between
repayment
start
date
and
default
date.
Zero represents defaults that occurred prior to the start of repayment.
Periodic
Defaults
Defaulted
principal
in
each
Year
in
Repayment
as
a
percentage
of
the
disbursed principal entering repayment in each Repayment Year
Defaulted principal includes any interest capitalization that occurred prior to
default
Defaulted principal is not reduced by any amounts recovered after the loan
defaulted
Because the numerator includes capitalized interest while the denominator does
not, default rates are higher than if the numerator and denominator both
included capitalized interest Total
The
sum
of
Periodic
Defaults
across
Years
in
Repayment
for
each
Repayment
Year
COHORT DEFAULT TRIANGLES
70 |
Note: Data as of 9/30/11.
(1)
Undergraduate/Graduate loans marketed under the Signature Student Loan brand.
(2)
Periodic Defaults for the most recent two calendar Years in Repayment are for a
partial year. (3)
Numerator is the amount of principal in each cohort that defaulted in each Year in
Repayment. Denominator is the amount of disbursed principal for that Repayment Year.
71
Undergraduate/Graduate
(1)
COHORT DEFAULT TRIANGLES |
Undergraduate/Graduate
(1)
Without Co-signer
Undergraduate/Graduate
(1)
With Co-signer
72
Note: Data as of 9/30/11.
(1)
Undergraduate/Graduate loans marketed under the Signature Student Loan brand.
(2)
Periodic Defaults for the most recent two calendar Years in Repayment are for a
partial year. (3)
Numerator is the amount of principal in each cohort that defaulted in each Year in
Repayment. Denominator is the amount of disbursed principal for that Repayment Year.
COHORT DEFAULT TRIANGLES |
COHORT DEFAULT TRIANGLES
Note: Data as of 9/30/11.
(1)
Undergraduate/Graduate loans marketed under the Signature Student Loan brand.
(2)
Periodic Defaults for the most recent two calendar Years in Repayment are for a
partial year. (3)
Numerator is the amount of principal in each cohort that defaulted in each Year in
Repayment. Denominator is the amount of disbursed principal for that Repayment Year.
Undergraduate/Graduate
(1)
Non-Profit
Undergraduate/Graduate
(1)
For-Profit
73 |
74
COHORT DEFAULT TRIANGLES
Note: Data as of 9/30/11.
(1)
Undergraduate/Graduate loans marketed under the Signature Student Loan brand.
(2)
FICO scores are based on the greater of the borrower and co-borrower scores as
of a date near the loan application. (3)
Periodic Defaults for the most recent two calendar Years in Repayment are for a
partial year. (4)
Numerator is the amount of principal in each cohort that defaulted in each Year in
Repayment. Denominator is the amount of disbursed principal for that Repayment Year.
Undergraduate/Graduate
(1)
Loans, FICO 740-850
(2)
Undergraduate/Graduate
(1)
Loans, FICO 700-739
(2) |
75
COHORT DEFAULT TRIANGLES
Note: Data as of 9/30/11.
(1)
Undergraduate/Graduate loans marketed under the Signature Student Loan brand.
(2)
FICO scores are based on the greater of the borrower and co-borrower scores as
of a date near the loan application. (3)
Periodic Defaults for the most recent two calendar Years in Repayment are for a
partial year. (4)
Numerator is the amount of principal in each cohort that defaulted in each Year in
Repayment. Denominator is the amount of disbursed principal for that Repayment Year.
Undergraduate/Graduate
(1)
Loans, FICO 670-699
(2)
Undergraduate/Graduate
(1)
Loans, FICO 640-669
(2) |
Smart Option
(1)
(interest only) Without Co-signer
Smart Option
(1)
(interest only) With Co-signer
76
COHORT DEFAULT TRIANGLES
Note: Data as of 9/30/11.
(1)
Private education loans loans marketed under the Smart Option Student Loan
brand. (2)
Periodic Defaults for the most recent two calendar Years in Repayment are for a
partial year. (3)
Numerator is the amount of principal in each cohort that defaulted in each Year in
Repayment. Denominator is the amount of disbursed principal for that Repayment Year. |
Private Consolidation Loans Without Co-signer
Private Consolidation Loans With Co-signer
77
COHORT DEFAULT TRIANGLES
Note: Data as of 9/30/11.
(1)
Periodic Defaults for the most recent two calendar Years in Repayment are for a
partial year. (2)
Numerator is the amount of principal in each cohort that defaulted in each Year in
Repayment. Denominator is the amount of disbursed principal for that Repayment Year. |
78
COHORT DEFAULT TRIANGLES
Note: Data as of 9/30/11.
(1)
FICO scores are based on the greater of the borrower and co-borrower scores as of a date near the
loan application. (2)
Periodic Defaults for the most recent two calendar Years in Repayment are for a partial year.
(3)
Numerator is the amount of principal in each cohort that defaulted in each Year in Repayment.
Denominator is the amount of disbursed principal for that Repayment Year. DTC With
Co-signer, FICO 670
(1)
DTC Without Co-signer, FICO
670
(1) |
79
COHORT DEFAULT TRIANGLES
Note: Data as of 9/30/11.
(1)
FICO scores are based on the greater of the borrower and co-borrower scores as
of a date near the loan application. (2)
Periodic Defaults for the most recent two calendar Years in Repayment are for a
partial year. (3)
Numerator is the amount of principal in each cohort that defaulted in each Year in
Repayment. Denominator is the amount of disbursed principal for that Repayment Year.
Career Training Loans, 670+ FICO
(1) |
RECENT PRIVATE LOAN ABS TRUST
PERFORMANCE
Sallie
Mae
is
currently
collecting
payments
from
a
much
higher
percentage
of
delinquent borrowers than in the past
Delinquent borrowers who have made at least one payment during
delinquency are far less likely to default
80
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
>90 Day Delinquent Borrowers
Trust Loans with a Payment Made in the
Last Month
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
Dlq in Sep-09
Dflt as of Sep-10
Dlq in Sep-10
Dflt as of Sep-11
Default Rate One Year Later
Trust Loans >90 dpd
Payments Made vs No Payments Made
Payments Made
No Payments Made |
RECOVERIES
As of year end 2010, Sallie Mae expected to collect 27% of a defaulted loans
balance, on average, across its managed private education loan portfolio
Recoveries
are
typically
realized
over
many
years
as
a
result
of
the
prevalent
use
of
long-term payment plans
While student loans are non-dischargeable in bankruptcy, the proceedings can
postpone recoveries until after borrowers emerge from bankruptcy
In 2005, Sallie Mae changed its recovery practices, leading to an increase in overall
recoveries and earlier collection of recovered amounts
Loans
that
defaulted
in
1998-2003
had
recovery
rates
of
7
14%
five
years
after default
The 2005 cohort had a recovery rate of 22.5% five years after default
Recovery experience for more recent cohorts has varied based on economic
conditions and the characteristics of defaulted loans
In 3Q 2011, Sallie Mae provided additional provision for loan loss to provide for
potential uncertainty regarding future recoveries due to continued high
unemployment rates; the 27% life-of loan recovery expectation remains in place
81 |
SLM APPENDIX |
83
($ in millions, except per share amounts)
Quarters Ended
September 30, 2011
June 30, 2011
September 30, 2010
Dollars
Diluted EPS
Dollars
Diluted
EPS
Dollars
Diluted EPS
GAAP net income (loss)
(47)
$
(0.10)
$
(6)
$
(0.02)
$
(495)
$
(1.06)
$
Adjustment from GAAP to "Core Earnings"
Net impact of derivative accounting
371
414
269
Net impact of goodwill and acquired intangibles
6
6
670
Total "Core Earnings" Adjustments before net tax effect
377
420
939
Net tax effect
(142)
(154)
(242)
Total "Core Earnings" Adjustments
235
266
697
"Core Earnings"
$188
$0.36
$260
$0.48
$202
$0.37
GAAP TO CORE EARNINGS
RECONCILIATION |
SALLIE MAE INVESTOR RELATIONS
WEBSITE
SLM
student
loan
trust
data
(Debt/asset
backed
securities
SLM
Student
Loan Trusts)
Static pool information
Detailed portfolio stratifications by trust as of the cutoff date
Accrued interest factors
Quarterly distribution factors
Historical
trust
performance
-
monthly
charge-off,
delinquency,
loan
status,
CPR,
etc.
by
trust
Since issued CPR
monthly CPR data by trust since issuance
SLM
student
loan
performance
by
trust
Issue
details
Current and historical monthly distribution reports
Distribution factors
Current rates
Prospectus for public transactions and Rule 144A transactions are available through
underwriters Additional information (Webcasts and presentations)
Archived and historical webcasts, transcripts and investor presentations
www.salliemae.com/investors
84 |